Risk factors for local tumor progression after RFA of pulmonary metastases: a matched case-control study
- 20 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Radiology
- Vol. 31 (7), 5361-5369
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07675-y
Abstract
Objectives Curative treatment of oligometastatic pulmonary disease aims at eradication of all metastases. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been shown to be an efficient method and the frequency of local tumor progression (LTP) should be minimized. The objective of this study was to determine the morphological and treatment-related risk factors for LTP after RFA of pulmonary metastases. Materials and methods All patients treated with RFA for pulmonary metastases from 2002 to 2014 were reviewed. All LTPs from 2011 to 2014 were individually matched on the basis of tumor size, number, and histology. In total, 48 LTPs and 112 controls were blindly analyzed for morphological factors including vicinity of bronchus and vessels as well as treatment-related factors such as the size of the ablation zone and ablation margins. Results In the simple regression analysis, the significant predictive variables were ≤ 5-mm distance to a large bronchus (OR = 4.94; p = 0.0095) or large vessel (OR = 7.09; p < 0.001), minimal ablation margin (≤ 5 mm (OR = 42.67; p < 0.001), and a central-peripheral ablation offset/ablation zone size > 0.36 (OR = 13.83; p = 0.013). In the multiple regression model, only a minimal ablation margin ≤ 5 mm remained a significant risk factor for LTP. Conclusion Only the minimal ablation margin remains significant in the multiple regression analysis; the other factors are presumably surrogates of an insufficient ablation margin. Improvement of lung RFA outcomes can probably be obtained by immediate post RFA evaluation of ablation margins to ensure a minimal ablation margin of at least 5 mm. Key Points • A distance < 5 mm to a bronchus or vessel of over 3 mm diameter is associated with insufficient ablation margin and thus risk factors for local tumor progression after pulmonary radiofrequency ablation. • A minimal ablation margin of > 5 mm after pulmonary RFA is associated with significantly less local tumor progression and should be looked for at the end of treatment session before needle removal in order to decrease local tumor progression. • Tumor location, pleural contact, occurrence of intra-alveolar hemorrhage, pulmonary atelectasis, and pneumothorax are not associated with an increased risk of local tumor progression.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic Factors After Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Colorectal Cancer and Rationale for Determining Surgical IndicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2013
- Imaging Features following Thermal Ablation of Lung MalignanciesSeminars in Interventional Radiology, 2013
- Survival after Radiofrequency Ablation in 122 Patients with Inoperable Colorectal Lung MetastasesCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2012
- A 10-Year Single-Center Experience on 708 Lung Metastasectomies: The Evidence of the “International Registry of Lung Metastases”Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2011
- Does tumor type affect local control by radiofrequency ablation in the lungs?European Journal of Radiology, 2010
- Long-term outcome of image-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of lung metastases: an open-labeled prospective trial of 148 patientsAnnals of Oncology, 2010
- Oligometastases and Oligo-recurrence: The New Era of Cancer TherapyJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Risk factors for local progression after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of lung tumorsCancer, 2006
- Long-term results of lung metastasectomy: Prognostic analyses based on 5206 casesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
- Hepatic Ablation Using Radiofrequency ElectrocauteryInvestigative Radiology, 1990