Evaluation of an opioid risk mitigation initiative for veterans undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty at San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System
Open Access
- 23 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
- Vol. 78 (4), 336-344
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaa406
Abstract
Guidelines recommend evaluating the risk of opioid-related adverse events prior to initiating opioid therapy. The orthopedic service at San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SFVHCS) has not routinely used risk assessment tools such as the Stratification Tool for Opioid Risk Mitigation, prescription drug monitoring program data, and urine drug screening prior to opioid prescribing. A quality improvement project was conducted to evaluate the number of pharmacist-provided opioid risk mitigation recommendations implemented by orthopedic providers for patients who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty at SFVHCS. A pharmacist-led workflow for completing risk mitigation reviews was developed in collaboration with orthopedic providers, and urine drug screening was added to the preoperative laboratory testing protocol. The following recommendations were communicated via electronic medical record: limit postoperative opioids to a 7- or 14-day supply based on risk of suicide and/or overdose, offer naloxone and a medication disposal bag, and order a urine drug screen if not already completed. Risk reviews were completed for 75 patients. Among 64 patients with 2-month postdischarge data available, 88% (7 of 8) of 7-day and 79% (44 of 56) of 14-day opioid supply recommendations were implemented; 41% (26 of 59) of recommendations to issue a medication disposal bag, 17% (2 of 12) recommendations to order a missing urine drug screen, and 9% (5 of 55) of recommendations to offer naloxone were implemented. Pharmacist-performed risk mitigation reviews paired with individualized recommendations led to high rates of orthopedic provider acceptance of limiting postdischarge opioid day supplies for patients who had total hip or knee arthroplasty. Alternative strategies may increase access to naloxone. Future research should examine the impact of risk mitigation tools in reducing prescribing of long-term opioid therapy and adverse events among orthopedic surgical patients.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends and predictors of opioid use after total knee and total hip arthroplastyPain, 2016
- Postoperative opioid use as an early indication of total hip arthroplasty failureActa Orthopaedica, 2016
- SQUIRE 2.0—Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence—Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus ProcessJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2015
- Opioid-use disorder among patients on long-term opioid therapy: impact of final DSM-5 diagnostic criteria on prevalence and correlatesSubstance Abuse and Rehabilitation, 2015
- The Role of Opioid Prescription in Incident Opioid Abuse and Dependence Among Individuals With Chronic Noncancer PainThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2014
- Opioid use prior to total hip arthroplasty leads to worse clinical outcomesInternational Orthopaedics, 2014
- Persistent pain after total knee or hip arthroplasty: differential study of prevalence, nature, and impactJournal of Pain Research, 2013
- Accidental Poisoning Mortality Among Patients in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health SystemMedical Care, 2011
- Reduction in Narcotic Use After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty and Association with Patient Pain Relief and SatisfactionThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2010
- Comparing Patient Outcomes After THA and TKA: Is There a Difference?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009