Consistency of safety monitoring using routine national databases: results using a quality of care interpretative model
- 29 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 30 (6), 1041-1048
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa071
Abstract
Background In the framework of targeted action for continuous safety monitoring, we aimed to evaluate the consistency of indicators derived from available databases for regular reporting. Methods We used a quality of care interpretative model to select characteristics from five national databases, aggregated and linked by homogeneous groups of providers. The target population included all subjects admitted to public hospitals for acute care in four regions of Italy between 2011 and 2013. The association between structures, processes and safety-related outcomes was investigated using odds ratios from generalized estimating equations logistic regression. Outcome measures included claims of malpractice and five patient safety indicators calculated from discharge abstracts using standardized algorithms. Results Over 3 years, claims of malpractice and sepsis increased, whereas deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism decreased. Hospitals with high vs. low volume of discharges were associated with −16% lower rates of claims, but +12% increased risk of sepsis. Compared with research institutes, university clinics had −17% lower rates of claims and −41% cases of dehiscence, with a +32% increased risk of deep vein thrombosis. Local health care authorities recorded −49% deep vein thrombosis, −26% pulmonary embolism, −40% sepsis and +37% risk of claims. Hospitals submitting cases of safe practices and implementing safety recommendations showed significantly higher rates for most outcome measures. Conclusions Indicators from regular databases can be conveniently used to develop a national safety monitoring system for hospital care. Although deeper analysis is needed, institutions with a higher propensity to implement safe practices and recommendations consistently showed higher rates of adverse events.Funding Information
- Supporto alle Regioni nello sviluppo e/o nel miglioramento del sistema di governance regionale del rischio clinico
- Italian Ministry of Health in the framework of the Research Programme ‘Ricerca Corrente’ 2013
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic reviewBMJ Open, 2013
- Implementation of the Tallinn Charter in the WHO European region: Where is the evidence? a systematic comparison of online information before and after the end of the year of signatureHealth Policy, 2012
- Revision of the European Data Protection Directive: opportunity or threat for public health monitoring?European Journal of Public Health, 2011
- International Comparability of Patient Safety Indicators in 15 OECD Member Countries: A Methodological Approach of Adjustment by Secondary DiagnosesHealth Services Research, 2011
- An Epidemiologic Study of Closed Emergency Department Malpractice Claims in a National Database of Physician Malpractice InsurersAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2010
- What can we learn about patient safety from information sources within an acute hospital: a step on the ladder of integrated risk management?Heart, 2008
- Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical PatientsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2007
- Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect adverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may all have a placeHeart, 2007
- The Italian health-care systemHealth Economics, 2005