A one-year time frame for voice prosthesis management. What should the physician expect? Is it an overrated job?
Open Access
- 1 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Pacini Editore in Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
- Vol. 40 (4), 270-276
- https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100x-n0587
Abstract
Management of late complications represents the main reason for reluctance in using voice prosthesis rehabilitation. The aim of this paper is to report our experience by describing the one-year management of a large cohort of patients in order to clarify how demanding management is in terms of burden on clinicians. Between June 2017 and June 2018, each access made at the Otolaryngology Clinic of our Institute for issues related to prosthesis by 70 laryngectomised patients rehabilitated by voice prosthesis was registered in a specic database. A review of the data provided information on the incidence, management and outcomes of adverse events encountered during the selected time frame. In addition, a T test was used to evaluate the differences between irradiated and non-irradiated patients and between primary and secondary tracheo-oesophageal-puncture. Leakage through the prosthesis was the most common cause for access (51.86%). The median number of accesses per patient per year was 3.47. The speech therapist autonomously managed 18.1% of accesses. The median number of accesses per patient per year needing a physician was 2.84. The median lifetime of the prosthesis was 4.85 months. Radiotherapy or modality (primary or secondary) of the puncture did not inuence the number of accesses per year or the prosthesis lifetime. This retrospective analysis of results highlighted the most frequent issues and the most effective measures to deal with them, which allowed us to dene a systematic algorithm to standardise and ease long-term outpatient management.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Objective and Subjective Assessment of Tracheoesophageal Prosthesis Voice OutcomeJournal of Voice, 2012
- Prospective clinical phase II study of two new indwelling voice prostheses (Provox Vega 22.5 and 20 Fr) and a novel anterograde insertion device (Provox Smart Inserter)The Laryngoscope, 2010
- A Thin Tracheal Silicone Washer to Solve Periprosthetic Leakage in Laryngectomies: Direct Results and Long‐Term Clinical EffectsThe Laryngoscope, 2008
- Long‐Term Results of Provox ActiValve, Solving the Problem of Frequent Candida‐ and “Underpressure”‐Related Voice Prosthesis ReplacementsThe Laryngoscope, 2008
- Current status and future prospects in prosthetic voice rehabilitation following laryngectomyJournal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 2008
- Managing problems with tracheoesophageal puncture for alaryngeal voice rehabilitationThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 2006
- Cervical spondylodiscitis: A rare complication after phonatory prosthesis insertionHead & Neck, 2006
- Autogenous Fat Injection for the Incontinent Tracheoesophageal Puncture SiteThe Laryngoscope, 2002
- In Situ Lifetime, Causes for Replacement, and Complications of the ProvoxTMVoice ProsthesisThe Laryngoscope, 1997
- Operative complications of tracheoesophageal punctureThe Laryngoscope, 1985