Distinct effectiveness in containing COVID-19 epidemic: Comparative analysis of two cities in China by mathematical modeling
Open Access
- 12 November 2021
- journal article
- infectious diseases
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS Global Public Health
- Vol. 1 (11), e0000043
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000043
Abstract
For better preparing future epidemic/pandemic, important lessons can be learned from how different parts of China responded to the early COVID-19 epidemic. In this study, we comparatively analyzed the effectiveness and investigated the mechanistic insight of two highly representative cities of China in containing this epidemic by mathematical modeling. Epidemiological data of Wuhan and Wenzhou was collected from local health commission, media reports and scientific literature. We used a deterministic, compartmental SEIR model to simulate the epidemic. Specific control measures were integrated into the model, and the model was calibrated to the recorded number of hospitalized cases. In the epicenter Wuhan, the estimated number of unisolated or unidentified cases approached 5000 before the date of city closure. By implementing quarantine, a 40% reduction of within-population contact was achieved initially, and continuously increased up to 70%. The expansion of emergency units has finally reduced the mean duration from disease onset to hospital admission from 10 to 3.2 days. In contrast, Wenzhou is characterized as an emerging region with large number of primarily imported cases. Quick response effectively reduced the duration from onset to hospital admission from 20 to 6 days. This resulted in reduction of R values from initial 2.3 to 1.6, then to 1.1. A 40% reduction of contact through within-population quarantine further decreased R values until below 1 (0.5; 95% CI: 0.4–0.65). Quarantine contributes to 37% and reduction of duration from onset to hospital admission accounts for 63% to the effectiveness in Wenzhou. In Wuhan, these two strategies contribute to 54% and 46%, respectively. Thus, control measures combining reduction of duration from disease onset to hospital admission and within-population quarantine are effective for both epicenters and settings primarily with imported cases.Funding Information
- Changjiang Scholar Program of Chinese Ministry of Education (IRT_17R88)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (91719300)
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected PneumoniaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Differential diagnosis of illness in patients under investigation for the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), Italy, February 2020Eurosurveillance, 2020
- Potential association between COVID-19 mortality and health-care resource availabilityThe Lancet. Global Health, 2020
- The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2020
- Risk Assessment of Novel Coronavirus COVID-19 Outbreaks Outside ChinaJournal of Clinical Medicine, 2020
- [An update on the epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus pneumonia(COVID-19)].2020
- First cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in France: surveillance, investigations and control measures, January 2020Eurosurveillance, 2020
- Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) early-stage importation risk to Europe, January 2020Eurosurveillance, 2020
- Comparing nonpharmaceutical interventions for containing emerging epidemicsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017
- The Bookstrap Method for Standard Errors and Confidence Intervals of the Adjusted Attributable RiskEpidemiology, 1992