Effect of manual capsulorhexis size and position on intraocular lens tilt, centration, and axial position

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the influence of a manual capsulorhexis size, shape, and position on postoperative axial position, tilt, and centration of intraocular lenses (IOLs). Setting Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria. Design Prospective cases series. Methods Patients had cataract surgery and had follow-ups 1 hour and 3 months after surgery. Postoperatively, patients were divided into 3 groups according to the capsulorhexis shape and size as follows: control, symmetrical capsulorhexis between 4.5 mm and 5.5 mm; small group, capsulorhexis smaller than 4.5 mm; and eccentric, all other capsulorhexes. At both follow-ups, a retroillumination image, partial coherence interferometry measurements, and Purkinje meter measurements were performed. Results This study comprised 255 eyes. The mean postoperative absolute anterior chamber depth shift in the control, eccentric capsulorhexis, and small capsulorhexis groups was 0.31 mm ± 0.27 (SD), 0.36 ± 0.24 mm, and 0.26 ± 0.24 mm, respectively (P = .419). The mean tilt in the control, eccentric capsulorhexis, and small capsulorhexis groups was 4.08 ± 2.13 degrees, 3.66 ± 2.04 degrees, and 2.82 ± 1.67 degrees, respectively (P = .370), and the mean decentration was 0.38 ± 0.23 mm, 0.40 ± 0.21 mm, and 0.17 ± 0.08 mm, respectively (P = .027). Conclusions Capsulorhexis size and shape had little effect on the capsular bag performance of modern IOLs. Only eyes with a severely malformed capsulorhexis had a slightly decentered IOL.