The complexities of nasal airflow: theory and practice
- 1 November 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Applied Physiology
- Vol. 127 (5), 1215-1223
- https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01118.2018
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of nasal valve area, valve stiffness, and turbinate region cross-sectional area on airflow rate, nasal resistance, flow limitation, and inspiratory “hysteresis” by the use of a mathematical model of nasal airflow. The model of O’Neill and Tolley ( Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 13: 273–277, 1988) describing the effects of valve area and stiffness on the nasal pressure-flow relationship was improved by the incorporation of additional terms involving 1) airflow through the turbinate region, 2) the dependence of the flow coefficients for the valve and turbinate region on the Reynolds number, and 3) effects of unsteady flow. The model was found to provide a good fit for normal values for nasal resistance and for pressure-flow curves reported in the literature for both congested and decongested states. Also, by showing the relative contribution of the nasal valve and turbinate region to nasal resistance, the model sheds light in explaining the generally poor correlation between nasal resistance measurements and the results from acoustic rhinometry. Furthermore, by proposing different flow conditions for the acceleration and deceleration phases of inspiration, the model produces an inspiratory loop (commonly referred to as hysteresis) consistent with those reported in the literature. With simulation of nasal flaring, the magnitude of the loop, the nasal resistance, and flow limitation all show change similar to that observed in the experimental results.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The present model provides considerable insight into some difficult conundrums in both clinical and technical aspects of nasal airflow. Also, the description of nasal airflow mechanics based on the Hagen–Poiseuille equation and Reynolds laminar-turbulent transition in long straight tubes, which has figured prominently in medical textbooks and journal articles for many years, is shown to be seriously in error at a fundamental level.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Discharge coefficient performance of Venturi, standard concentric orifice plate, V-cone and wedge flow meters at low Reynolds numbersJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2011
- A Fluid Mechanical Interpretation of Hysteresis in RhinomanometryISRN Otolaryngology, 2011
- On the assumption of steadiness of nasal cavity flowJournal of Biomechanics, 2010
- Pressure Drop in Laminar Developing Flow in Noncircular Ducts: A Scaling and Modeling ApproachJournal of Fluids Engineering, 2009
- Wall Shear Stress In Accelerating And Decelerating Pipe FlowsJournal of Hydraulic Research, 1997
- Analysis of rhinomanometric data based upon a model of nasal airflow and logarithmic transformation of the dataClinical Otolaryngology, 1996
- Wall shear stress in accelerating and decelerating turbulent pipe flowsJournal of Hydraulic Research, 1996
- Accelerated and Decelerated Flows in a Circular Pipe : 1st Report, Velocity Profile and Friction CoefficientBulletin of JSME, 1986
- An Improvement in the Calculation of Turbulent Friction in Rectangular DuctsJournal of Fluids Engineering, 1976
- Der Strömungswiderstand in den menschlichen Atemwegen und der Einfluss der unregelmässigen Verzweigung des Bronchialsystems auf den Atmungsverlauf in verschiedenen LungenbezirkenPflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 1915