Students’ top 10 priorities of research uncertainties on students’ sleep: a pragmatic James Lind Alliance approach
Open Access
- 26 January 2021
- Vol. 11 (1), e043697
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043697
Abstract
Objectives Inspired by the James Lind Alliance (JLA) user involvement approach, the aim of the present study was to identify the top 10 uncertainties for sleep research raised by students in higher education, and to discuss our experiences with adapting the JLA method to a student population. Design The study design is a pragmatic JLA approach, including a priority setting partnership within the field of sleep, collection of sleep-related research uncertainties as reported by students in higher education, sorting of the uncertainties and a final identification of the top 10 uncertainties through collaborative work between researchers, students, stakeholders and experts in the field. Uncertainties were collected using a one-question online survey: ‘as a student, which question(s) do you consider to be important with regards to sleep?’. A variety of approaches were applied to promote the survey to the students, including social media, radio, the university website, stands in university cafeterias and a sleep stunt. NVivo V.12 was used to code and sort the questions. Setting A higher education institution in Norway. Participants 555 students. Results The data collection provided 608 uncertainties, and the following prioritised top 10: (1) screen time, (2) stress, (3) educational achievements, (4) social relations, (5) mental health, (6) physical activity, (7) indoor environment, (8) substance abuse, (9) shift work and (10) sleep quality. Despite successful data collection, we found sleep to be a broad topic, and defining specific questions throughout the sorting and verification process proved difficult. Conclusions We identified the prioritised top 10 research uncertainties as reported by students in higher education, ranking screen time first. However, the process was time and resource consuming. The research uncertainties addressed by the students showed great diversity, characterised by heterogeneity and a lack of specificity, making verification of the uncertainties challenging.This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010European Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011
- Prevalence and correlates of insomnia in the Swedish population aged 19–75 yearsSleep Medicine, 2010
- The influence of sleep quality, sleep duration and sleepiness on school performance in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic reviewSleep Medicine Reviews, 2010
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidenceThe Lancet, 2009
- Effects of two nights sleep deprivation and two nights recovery sleep on response inhibitionJournal of Sleep Research, 2006
- Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information materialEmergencias, 2006
- Relationship of Sleep Hygiene Awareness, Sleep Hygiene Practices, and Sleep Quality in University StudentsBehavioral Medicine, 2002
- One Night of Sleep Loss Impairs Innovative Thinking and Flexible Decision MakingOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999
- The effects of chronic sleep reduction on the performance of cognitive tasks sensitive to sleep deprivationApplied Cognitive Psychology, 1995
- Leukocytosis and natural killer cell function parallel neurobehavioral fatigue induced by 64 hours of sleep deprivation.JCI Insight, 1994