Agricultural eco-compensation may not necessarily reduce chemical inputs
- 31 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Science of The Total Environment
- Vol. 741, 139847
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139847
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- China National Key Research and Development Plan Project (2017YFC0506402)
- China National Natural Science Foundation (41201586)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service programProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
- Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countriesEcological Economics, 2013
- Payments for environmental services in Costa RicaEcological Economics, 2008
- Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issuesEcological Economics, 2008
- Factors Affecting Farmers’ Participation in Agri‐environmental Measures: A Northern Italian PerspectiveJournal of Agricultural Economics, 2008
- The effects of land tenure policy on rural livelihoods and food sufficiency in the upland village of Que, North Central VietnamAgricultural Systems, 2007
- The impact of water and agriculture policy scenarios on irrigated farming systems in Italy: An analysis based on farm level multi-attribute linear programming modelsAgricultural Systems, 2007
- Fertilizer price policy, the environment and farms behaviorJournal of Policy Modeling, 2007
- Multi-criteria policy scenario analysis for public regulation of irrigated agricultureAgricultural Systems, 2006
- Collective household labor supply: nonparticipation and income taxationJournal of Public Economics, 2003