MRI of non-specific low back pain and/or lumbar radiculopathy: do we need T1 when using a sagittal T2-weighted Dixon sequence?
Open Access
- 4 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Radiology
- Vol. 30 (5), 2583-2593
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06626-6
Abstract
Objective To show that for the MRI workup of non-specific low back pain and/or lumbar radiculopathy, the acquisition of T1-weighted sequences in the sagittal plane could be waived when using an FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequence. Materials and methods Three musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively reviewed fifty lumbar spine MRI examinations performed for non-specific low back pain and/or lumbar radiculopathy. Two protocols were separately analyzed in the sagittal plane: a standard protocol (T1-weighted, in-phase, and water-only images of an FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequence) and a simplified protocol (fat-only, in-phase, and water-only images of an FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequence). Eight items usually assessed on T1-weighted sequences were analyzed for each of the vertebrae (n = 250), vertebral endplates (n = 500), vertebral corners (n = 1000), foramina (n = 500), lamina (n = 500), and facet joints (n = 500). Interchangeability of these protocols was tested using the individual equivalence index. A decrease in interobserver agreement of ≥ 5% when one reader used the simplified protocol compared with when both readers used the standard protocol was considered clinically significant. Interreader and intrareader agreement were assessed using kappa statistics. Rates of findings with each protocol were compared using odd ratios. Results The standard and simplified protocols were interchangeable (range of upper bound of the 95%CI of individual equivalence index = 0.25 to 1.38%). Intraprotocol and interprotocol interreader kappa values were similar (0.253–0.671 vs. 0.236–0.723, respectively). Rates of findings were not statistically significantly different (p ≥ 0.074), or were higher with the simplified protocol (p ≤ 0.036). Conclusion In our target population, a single sagittal T2-weighted Dixon sequence may replace the recommended combination of T1-, T2-, and fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences. Key Points • In patients with non-specific low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy, spine MRI in the sagittal plane could be limited to a single FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequence, hereby reducing the acquisition time. • A simplified protocol of spine MRI in the sagittal plane combining FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequence provides the same information as a standard protocol including T1-, T2-, and fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences for the workup of degenerative lumbar spine lesions. • For some findings shown on the simplified protocol, such as focal bone marrow replacement lesions or signs of infection, additional sequences including pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted sequences may be required, as is currently the case when using the standard protocol.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back painArthritis & Rheumatism, 2012
- MRI of Spinal Bone Marrow: Part 1, Techniques and Normal Age-Related AppearancesAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2011
- Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain: Advice for High-Value Health Care From the American College of PhysiciansAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- A Practical MRI Grading System for Lumbar Foraminal StenosisAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2010
- Lumbar Spine: Reliability of MR Imaging FindingsRadiology, 2009
- Dixon techniques for water and fat imagingJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2008
- Le « de Sèze » magnétiqueJournal de Radiologie, 2007
- T2‐weighted spine imaging with a fast three‐point dixon technique: Comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppressionJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2004
- Three‐point dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correctionMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1991