When CEO and board chair are in conflict: A resource dependence perspective
Open Access
- 9 May 2022
- journal article
- Published by Virtus Interpress in Corporate Ownership and Control
- Vol. 19 (3), 123-132
- https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv19i3art9
Abstract
The board of directors serves two functions in the organization: monitoring and resource provision. Agency theory mainly addresses the former, while resource dependence theory focuses on the latter. However, these theories consistently assume that board members are not only able but also consistently willing to fulfill their roles. From a resource dependence perspective, this means that board members are generally inclined to share their resources (information, social and political connections, and functional experience) with the CEO. We challenge this assumption by postulating that in the context of dyadic conflict between the CEO and board chair, these resources will not be accessible to the CEO, hence the resource provision function of the board will be interrupted. We, therefore, unpack the black box of the board dynamics by merging resource dependence theory with conflict literature to a) present an in-depth description of the CEO-board chair conflict and b) its implications for the CEO (heightened turnover intentions), the board (board cohesion and board’s monitoring role), and the organization. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Services and conflict management: Cultural and European integration perspectivesInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2010
- A Multilevel View of Intragroup ConflictJournal of Management, 2008
- Outside directors' industry‐specific experience and firms' liability of newnessStrategic Management Journal, 2008
- The Role of Environmental Dynamics in Building a First Mover Advantage TheoryAcademy of Management Review, 2007
- Defining conflict and making choices about its managementInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 2006
- INFORMATION SHARING AND GROUP CONFLICT: GOING BEYOND DECISION MAKING TO UNDERSTAND THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION SHARING ON GROUP PERFORMANCEInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 2004
- Battle in the Boardroom: A Discursive PerspectiveJournal of Management Studies, 2002
- Managing Conflict Between Departments to Serve CustomersHuman Relations, 1992
- First-mover advantagesStrategic Management Journal, 1988
- Organizational Conflict: Concepts and ModelsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1967