Does Environmental Regulation Promote Environmental Innovation? An Empirical Study of Cities in China
Open Access
- 23 December 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 19 (1), 139
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010139
Abstract
Promoting environmental innovation through environmental regulation is a key measure for cities to reduce environmental pressure; however, the role of environmental regulation in environmental innovation is controversial. This study used the number of environmental patent applications to measure urban environmental innovation and analyzed the role of urban environmental regulation on urban environmental innovation with the help of the spatial Durbin model (SDM). The results showed that: (1) From 2007 to 2017, the number of environmental patent applications in China has grown rapidly, and technologies related to buildings dominated the development of China’s environmental innovation. (2) Although the number of cities participating in environmental innovation was increasing, China’s environmental innovation activities were highly concentrated in a few cities (Beijing, Shenzhen, and Shanghai), showing significant spatial correlation and spatial agglomeration characteristics. (3) Urban environmental regulation had a positive U-shaped relationship with urban environmental innovation capability, which was consistent with what the Porter hypothesis advocates.Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41901139)
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of China's investment increase in fixed assets on ecological environment: an empirical analysisEnergy Procedia, 2011
- Technical change and the marginal cost of abatementEnergy Economics, 2008
- Pollution Abatement Costs and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to U.S. States: A Nonparametric ReassessmentThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2007
- Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clustersResearch Policy, 2005
- Trade liberalization, corruption, and environmental policy formation: theory and evidenceJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003
- Public and private spending for environmental protection: a cross‐country policy analysisFiscal Studies, 2001
- Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?American Economic Review, 2001
- Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data StudyThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1997
- Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technologyResearch Policy, 1996
- The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: Direct and indirect effectsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1990