Theft of public assets in developing countries and the ineffective legal frameworks on cross-border asset tracing and confiscation
Open Access
- 8 June 2021
- journal article
- Published by Virtus Interpress in Journal of Governance and Regulation
- Vol. 10 (2, special), 309-317
- https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv10i2siart11
Abstract
In most developing countries with weak rule of law and fledgling democratic institutions, theft of public assets by public office holders is rampant and has a strong correlation with the excruciating level of poverty and underdevelopment that besiege these countries (Ijewereme, 2013). While a myriad number of reasons may be responsible for this situation, the absence of a mature legal framework as well as the scant availability of sufficiently trained government personnel to trace and recover stolen assets, hidden domestically and abroad, arguably remain contributory factors. Granted that corrupt public office holders are typically enabled by porous (domestic) legal frameworks that provide them wide escape routes for their crimes, contestably however, the laws bordering on confiscation of assets in many foreign countries (safe havens) seem intentionally designed to frustrate any recovery of stolen assets by developing countries. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the rate of stealing public assets by public office holders in developing countries is foreseen to rise astronomically and is likely to deepen their existing levels of poverty and hopelessness (Ayode, 2020). Using Nigeria as an example of a developing country, the paper critically examines the underlying defects in the cross-border legal framework on asset recovery and confiscation and proffers suggestions on how these defects could be remedied.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Economic crime and the global financial crisisLaw and Financial Markets Review, 2011
- Reluctant partners?Security Dialogue, 2011
- Dancing with the devil: Country size and the incentive to tolerate money launderingInternational Review of Law and Economics, 2010
- A Zone of Ambiguity: The Political Economy of Cigarette BootleggingThe British Journal of Criminology, 2006
- Civil recovery proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002Journal of Money Laundering Control, 2006
- Money LaunderingCrime and Justice, 2006
- False and Reluctant Friends? National Money Laundering Regulation, International Compliance and Non-Cooperative CountriesEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 2005
- The Tenuous Relationship Between the Fight Against Money Laundering and the Disruption of Criminal FinanceSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- The Socially Bounded Decision Making of Persistent Property OffendersThe Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 1992
- PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: ANTON PILLER ORDERSThe Modern Law Review, 1983