Brief Behavioral Interventions for Substance Use in Adolescents: A Meta-analysis
- 1 October 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in PEDIATRICS
- Vol. 146 (4)
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-0351
Abstract
CONTEXT: Adolescents with problematic substance use (SU) are at risk for far-reaching adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Synthesize the evidence regarding the effects of brief behavioral interventions for adolescents (12–20 years) with problematic SU. DATA SOURCES: We conducted literature searches in Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycInfo through October 31, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: We screened 33 272 records and citations for interventions in adolescents with at least problematic SU, retrieved 1831 articles, and selected 22 randomized controlled trials of brief interventions meeting eligibility criteria for meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: We followed Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality guidelines. We categorized brief interventions into components, including motivational interviewing (MI), psychoeducation, and treatment as usual. Outcomes included SU (abstinence, days used per month) for alcohol and cannabis, and substance-related problem scales. Strength of evidence (SoE) was assessed. RESULTS: Both pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted by using random effects models. Compared to treatment as usual, the use of MI reduces heavy alcohol use days by 0.7 days per month (95% credible interval [CrI]: −1.6 to 0.02; low SoE), alcohol use days by 1.1 days per month (95% CrI −2.2 to −0.3; moderate SoE), and overall substance-related problems by a standardized net mean difference of 0.5 (95% CrI –1.0 to 0; low SoE). The use of MI did not reduce cannabis use days, with a net mean difference of −0.05 days per month (95% CrI: −0.26 to 0.14; moderate SoE). LIMITATIONS: There was lack of consistently reported outcomes and limited available comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MI reduces heavy alcohol use, alcohol use days, and SU-related problems in adolescents but does not reduce cannabis use days.This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Brief intervention for drug-abusing adolescents in a school setting: Outcomes and mediating factorsJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2012
- Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2012
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Randomized controlled trial of motivational enhancement therapy with nontreatment-seeking adolescent cannabis users: A further test of the teen marijuana check-up.Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2011
- Motivational interviewing to reduce substance-related consequences: Effects for incarcerated adolescents with depressed moodDrug and Alcohol Dependence, 2011
- Impact of Adolescent Alcohol and Drug Use on Neuropsychological Functioning in Young Adulthood: 10-Year OutcomesJournal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 2011
- A Brief Motivational Interview in a Pediatric Emergency Department, Plus 10‐day Telephone Follow‐up, Increases Attempts to Quit Drinking Among Youth and Young Adults Who Screen Positive for Problematic DrinkingAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2010
- Screening and Brief Intervention to Reduce Marijuana Use Among Youth and Young Adults in a Pediatric Emergency DepartmentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2009
- The adolescent cannabis check-up: Randomized trial of a brief intervention for young cannabis usersJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2008
- Motivational enhancement therapy for adolescent marijuana users: A preliminary randomized controlled trial.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2006