Influence of Noninvasive Ventilation Protocol on Intubation Rates in Subjects With De Novo Respiratory Failure
- 1 April 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Daedalus Enterprises in Respiratory Care
- Vol. 65 (4), 525-534
- https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.07104
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of noninvasive ventilation (NW) is debated in de novo respiratory failure. Prolonged sessions, using a dedicated NW ventilator, with high PEEP levels could be associated with better outcomes than shorter sessions using an ICU ventilator, with low PEEP levels. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to test whether the incidence of intubation was influenced by the NW protocol in subjects admitted to the ICU for de novo respiratory failure. METHODS: We selected randomized trials on NW indexed in medical literature databases from their inception to April 2018. Pediatric studies, those performed outside of the ICU, trials with subjects on NW for a reason other than de novo respiratory failure, and studies in which NW protocol was not specified were excluded. Two authors independently extracted intubation rates and the NW protocol (prolonged or short sessions, type of ventilator, and PEEP levels). RESULTS: Fourteen studies, which included 750 subjects treated with NW for de novo respiratory failure in ICU, were analyzed. Overall intubation rate was 38%, 95% CI 31-45% and was not influenced by prolonged NW sessions or the type of ventilator. The 154 subjects treated with PEEP greater than the median overall PEEP (6 cm H2O) had a PEEP level of 8 +/- 2 cm H2O and a pressure support level of 7 +/- 2 cm H2O. Their intubation rate was lower than the 293 subjects treated with lower PEEP levels (25%, 95% CI 15-37% vs 43%, 95% CI 33-54%, respectively, P = .03). Inclusion criteria were heterogeneous, and critical information on NIV application were frequently lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Except for high PEEP levels that might be associated with lower intubation rates, the protocol for carrying out NW does not seem to influence intubation rate in patients with de novo respiratory failure.This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Comparison of Spontaneous Breathing and Muscle Paralysis in Two Different Severities of Experimental Lung Injury*Critical Care Medicine, 2013
- Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Noninvasive VentilationSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2012
- Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeJAMA, 2012
- Spontaneous breathing during lung-protective ventilation in an experimental acute lung injury modelCritical Care Medicine, 2012
- Early use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute lung injuryCritical Care Medicine, 2012
- Meta-analysis: Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary EdemaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2010
- Higher vs Lower Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeJAMA, 2010
- Time of non-invasive ventilationIntensive Care Medicine, 2006
- Physiologic Effects of Noninvasive Ventilation during Acute Lung InjuryAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2005
- Noninvasive Ventilation in Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory FailureAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2003