Some sentences prime pragmatic reasoning in the verification and evaluation of comparisons.
- 1 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Vol. 48 (4), 569-582
- https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001082
Abstract
While most research on scalar implicature has focused on the lexical scale "some" vs "all," here we investigated an understudied scale formed by two syntactic constructions: categorizations (e.g.. "Wilma is a nurse") and comparisons ("Wilma is like a nurse"). An experimental study by Rubio-Fernandez et al. (2017) showed high rates of logical responses to superordinate comparisons, even though they are underinformative when interpreted pragmatically (e.g.. "A robin is like a bird" implies that a robin is not a bird). Based on recent studies on enrichment priming, we predicted that including "some" and "all" statements (which typically elicit high rates of pragmatic responses) in sentence verification and sentence evaluation tasks would introduce an informativity bias, increasing pragmatic responses to superordinate comparisons. The results of three Web-based experiments supported our predictions, showing that different scalar expressions not only give rise to different rates of scalar implicatures, but can also affect the degree to which an experimental task elicits pragmatic reasoning.Funding Information
- Research Council of Norway (275505)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximalJournal of Memory and Language, 2013
- Pragmatic inferences modulate N400 during sentence comprehension: Evidence from picture–sentence verificationNeuroscience Letters, 2013
- Knowledge and Implicature: Modeling Language Understanding as Social CognitionTopics in Cognitive Science, 2013
- Scalar quantifiers: Logic, acquisition, and processingLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 2010
- Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American EnglishBehavior Research Methods, 2009
- The Rise ofLikein Spontaneous QuotationsDiscourse Processes, 2007
- Folk notions of um and uh, you know, and likeText & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 2007
- Placing like in telling storiesDiscourse Studies, 2006
- Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicaturesLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 2005
- Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversationJournal of Pragmatics, 2003