The nitrogen footprint of organic food in the United States
Open Access
- 27 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Environmental Research Letters
- Vol. 15 (4), 045004
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7029
Abstract
We estimated the reactive nitrogen (Nr) lost per unit food Nr consumed for organic food production in the United States and compared it to conventional production. We used a nitrogen footprint model approach, which accounts for both differences in Nr losses as well as differences in productivity of the two systems. Additionally, we quantified the types of Nr inputs (new versus recycled) that are used in both production systems. We estimated Nr losses from organic crop and animal production to be of comparable magnitude to conventional production losses, with the exception of beef. While Nr losses from organic vegetables are possibly higher (+37%), Nr losses from organic grains, starchy roots, legumes are likely of similar magnitude to conventional production (+7%, +6%, -12%, respectively). Nr losses from organic poultry, pigmeat, and dairy production are also likely comparable to conventional production (+9%, +10%, +12%, respectively), while Nr losses from organic beef production were estimated to be higher (+124%). Due to the high variability and high uncertainty in Nr efficiency in both systems we cannot make conclusions yet on the statistical significance of these potential differences. Conventional production relies heavily on the creation of new Nr (70-90% of inputs are from new Nr sources like synthetic fertilizer) whereas organic production primarily utilizes already existing Nr (0-50% of organic inputs are from new Nr sources like leguminous N fixation). Consuming organically produced foods has little impact on an individual's food N footprint but changes the percentage of new versus recycled Nr in the footprint. With the exception of beef, Nr losses from organic production per unit N in product are comparable to conventional production. However, organic production requires the creation of less new Nr, which could reduce global Nr pollution.Funding Information
- The Organic Center (GF14597)
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Profiles of Organic Food Consumers in a Large Sample of French Adults: Results from the Nutrinet-Santé Cohort StudyPLOS ONE, 2013
- Reactive nitrogen inputs to US lands and waterways: how certain are we about sources and fluxes?Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2013
- Ranking Transitive Chemical-Disease Inferences Using Local Network Topology in the Comparative Toxicogenomics DatabasePLOS ONE, 2012
- Integrating Ecological, Carbon and Water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planetEcological Indicators, 2012
- A meta‐analysis of the differences in environmental impacts between organic and conventional farmingBritish Food Journal, 2009
- Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential SolutionsScience, 2008
- Long‐Term Agronomic Performance of Organic and Conventional Field Crops in the Mid‐Atlantic RegionAgronomy Journal, 2008
- DO ORGANIC FARMING PRACTICES REDUCE NITRATE LEACHING?Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2001
- Nitrogen leaching from conventional versus organic farming systems — a systems modelling approachEuropean Journal of Agronomy, 2000
- Life cycle assessment of milk production — a comparison of conventional and organic farmingJournal of Cleaner Production, 2000