Asymmetric Underlying Mechanisms of Relation-Based and Property-Based Noun–Noun Conceptual Combination
Open Access
- 26 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychology
- Vol. 12, 567971
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567971
Abstract
Conceptual combination is a fundamental human cognitive ability by which people can experience infinite thinking by artfully combining finite knowledge. For example, one can instantly combine “cactus” and “fish” together as “prickly fish” even if one has never previously heard of a “cactus fish.” Although two major combinatorial types—property and relational combinations—have been identified, the underlying processes of each remain elusive. This study investigates the asymmetric processing mechanisms underlying property and relational combinations by examining differential semantic activation during noun–noun conceptual combination. Across two experiments utilizing each combinatorial process as semantic priming and implementing a lexical decision task immediately after combination, we measure and compare the semantic activation patterns of intrinsic and extrinsic semantic features in these two combinatorial types. We found converging evidence that property and relational combinations involve asymmetric semantic information and entail distinct processing mechanisms. In property combination, the intrinsic feature in the modifier concept showed greater activation than the semantic feature of the same dimension in the head concept. In contrast, in relational combination, the extrinsic semantic feature in the head concept and the whole modifier concept showed similar levels of activation. Moreover, our findings also showed that these patterns of semantic activation occurred only when the combinatorial process was complete, indicating that accessing the same lexical-semantic information is not sufficient to observe asymmetric patterns. These findings demonstrate that property combination involves replacing a specific semantic feature of the head noun with that of the modifier noun, whereas relational combination involves completing the semantic feature of the head noun with the whole modifier concept. We discuss the implications of these findings, research limitations, and future research directions.Funding Information
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017S1A5B5A07061824)
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
- Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brainProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Neural correlates of implicit and explicit combinatorial semantic processingNeuroImage, 2010
- The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: A behavioral and fMRI studyNeuroImage, 2009
- Conceptual Combination During Sentence ComprehensionPsychological Science, 2007
- Attributive and relational processes in nominal combinationJournal of Memory and Language, 2003
- Efficient Creativity: Constraint‐Guided Conceptual CombinationCognitive Science, 2000
- Relations versus Properties in Conceptual CombinationJournal of Memory and Language, 1998
- An introduction to latent semantic analysisDiscourse Processes, 1998
- Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997