Development of a Lung Rescue Team to Improve Care of Subjects With Refractory Acute Respiratory Failure
- 4 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Daedalus Enterprises in Respiratory Care
- Vol. 65 (4), 420-426
- https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.07350
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A lung-protective mechanical ventilation strategy has become the hallmark of ventilation management for patients with acute respiratory failure. However, some patients progress to more severe forms of acute respiratory failure with refractory hypoxemia. In such circumstances, individualized titration of mechanical ventilation according to the patient’s specific respiratory and cardiovascular pathophysiology is desirable. A lung rescue team (LRT) was recently established at our institution to improve the medical care of patients with acute respiratory failure when conventional treatment fails. The aim of this report is to describe the consultation processes, the cardiopulmonary assessment, and the procedures of the LRT. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the LRT management of patients with acute respiratory failure and refractory hypoxemia at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. The LRT is composed of a critical care physician, the ICU respiratory therapist on duty, the ICU nurse on duty, and 2 critical care fellows. In the LRT approach, respiratory mechanics are evaluated through lung recruitment maneuvers and decremental PEEP trials by means of 3 tools: esophageal manometry, echocardiography, and electrical impedance tomography lung imaging. RESULTS: The LRT was consulted 89 times from 2014 to 2019 for evaluation and management of severely critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure and refractory hypoxemia on mechanical ventilation. The LRT was requested a median of 2 (interquartile range 1–6) d after intubation to optimize mechanical ventilation and to titrate PEEP in 77 (86%) subjects, to manage ventilation in 8 (9%) subjects on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and to manage weaning strategy from mechanical ventilation in 4 (5%) subjects. The LRT found consolidations with atelectasis responsive to recruitment maneuvers in 79% (n = 70) of consultations. The LRT findings translated into a change of care in 81% (n = 72) of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The LRT individualized the management of severe acute respiratory failure. The LRT consultations were shown to be effective, safe, and efficient, with an impact on decision-making in the ICU.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimization of Mechanical Ventilation in a 31-Year-Old Morbidly Obese Man With Refractory HypoxemiaA & A Case Reports, 2017
- Clusters of ineffective efforts during mechanical ventilation: impact on outcomeIntensive Care Medicine, 2016
- Spontaneous Effort During Mechanical Ventilation: Maximal Injury With Less Positive End-Expiratory Pressure*Critical Care Medicine, 2016
- Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 CountriesJAMA, 2016
- Recruitment Maneuvers and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration in Morbidly Obese ICU PatientsCritical Care Medicine, 2016
- Driving Pressure and Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Asynchronies during mechanical ventilation are associated with mortalityIntensive Care Medicine, 2015
- Spontaneous Effort Causes Occult Pendelluft during Mechanical VentilationAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2013
- Regional lung perfusion estimated by electrical impedance tomography in a piglet model of lung collapseJournal of Applied Physiology, 2012
- Imbalances in Regional Lung VentilationAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2004