Individualized pay-for-performance arrangements: Peer reactions and consequences.
- 1 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Applied Psychology
- Vol. 106 (8), 1202-1223
- https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000820
Abstract
We contribute to understanding the previously unrecognized consequences of individualized employment arrangements on the relationship between pay and performance. Increases in the application of pay-for-performance (PFP) idiosyncratic deals (PFP i-deals) raise questions about how individualized PFP arrangements affect the performance of peers who do not receive such customized deals. As pay systems become more individualized, understanding the economic ramifications of how PFP i-deals affect peer performance is essential for understanding the total unit effects of implementing PFP i-deals. To examine these peer effects, we explored peer responses to PFP i-deals and identified boundary conditions on broad theoretical assumptions underlying the conclusion that PFP increases unit performance. We tested our predictions by applying multilevel random-coefficient discontinuous growth models to a sample of 451 peers nested in 117 business units of a for-profit health-care organization. Immediately after PFP i-deal implementation in the unit, the performance level of peers was negatively affected. Additionally, peer performance trends after PFP i-deal implementation were lower than they were before the PFP i-deal implementation. Our study also identified contextual factors that influence peer responses to PFP i-deal implementation.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incentive Schemes, Sorting, and Behavioral Biases of Employees: Experimental EvidenceAmerican Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2012
- Team Member Change, Flux in Coordination, and Performance: Effects of Strategic Core Roles, Information Transfer, and Cognitive AbilityThe Academy of Management Journal, 2012
- Justice as a dynamic construct: Effects of individual trajectories on distal work outcomes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011
- THE IMPACT OF PAY SECRECY ON INDIVIDUAL TASK PERFORMANCEPersonnel Psychology, 2010
- 6 Pay and Performance: Individuals, Groups, and ExecutivesAcademy of Management Annals, 2009
- Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firmStrategic Management Journal, 2008
- Keeping up with the Joneses: A field study of the relationships among upward, lateral, and downward comparisons and pay level satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008
- A contingent view of reactions to objective pay conditions: Interdependence among pay structure characteristics and pay relative to internal and external referents.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006
- How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001