Hurry Up, We Need to Find the Key! How Regulatory Focus Design Affects Children’s Trust in a Social Robot
Open Access
- 8 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Abstract
In educational scenarios involving social robots, understanding the way robot behaviors affect children’s motivation to achieve their learning goals is of vital importance. It is crucial for the formation of a trust relationship between the child and the robot so that the robot can effectively fulfill its role as a learning companion. In this study, we investigate the effect of a regulatory focus design scenario on the way children interact with a social robot. Regulatory focus theory is a type of self-regulation that involves specific strategies in pursuit of goals. It provides insights into how a person achieves a particular goal, either through a strategy focused on “promotion” that aims to achieve positive outcomes or through one focused on “prevention” that aims to avoid negative outcomes. In a user study, 69 children (7–9 years old) played a regulatory focus design goal-oriented collaborative game with the EMYS robot. We assessed children’s perception of likability and competence and their trust in the robot, as well as their willingness to follow the robot’s suggestions when pursuing a goal. Results showed that children perceived the prevention-focused robot as being more likable than the promotion-focused robot. We observed that a regulatory focus design did not directly affect trust. However, the perception of likability and competence was positively correlated with children’s trust but negatively correlated with children’s acceptance of the robot’s suggestions.Funding Information
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (765955)
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regulatory Focus Theory, Trust, and Privacy ConcernJournal of Service Research, 2009
- A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?Psychological Bulletin, 2008
- Value From Regulatory FitCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2005
- A meta‐analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learningCommunication Monographs, 2004
- Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate RelianceHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2004
- The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- Beyond pleasure and pain.American Psychologist, 1997
- Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children's perceptions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986