Accuracy of health‐related information regarding COVID‐19 on Twitter during a global pandemic
Open Access
- 29 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in World Medical & Health Policy
- Vol. 13 (3), 503-517
- https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.468
Abstract
This study was performed to analyze the accuracy of health-related information on Twitter during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Authors queried Twitter on three dates for information regarding COVID-19 and five terms (cure, emergency or emergency room, prevent or prevention, treat or treatments, vitamins or supplements) assessing the first 25 results with health-related information. Tweets were authoritative if written by governments, hospitals, or physicians. Two physicians assessed each tweet for accuracy. Metrics were compared between accurate and inaccurate tweets using χ2 analysis and Mann–Whitney U. A total of 25.4% of tweets were inaccurate. Accurate tweets were more likely written by Twitter authenticated authors (49.8% vs. 20.9%, 28.9% difference, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.7–38.2) with accurate tweet authors having more followers (19,491 vs. 7346; 3446 difference, 95% CI: 234–14,054) versus inaccurate tweet authors. Likes, retweets, tweet length, botometer scores, writing grade level, and rank order did not differ between accurate and inaccurate tweets. We found 1/4 of health-related COVID-19 tweets inaccurate indicating that the public should not rely on COVID-19 health information written on Twitter. Ideally, improved government regulatory authority, public/private industry oversight, independent fact-checking, and artificial intelligence algorithms are needed to ensure inaccurate information on Twitter is removed.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing Sustainable Cancer Education Programs: Training Public Health Students to Deliver Cancer 101 in Puerto RicoJournal of Cancer Education, 2016
- Social Media's Initial Reaction to Information and Misinformation on Ebola, August 2014: Facts and RumorsPublic Health Reports, 2016
- Health On the Net's 20 Years of Transparent and Reliable Health Information.2016
- Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: a dangerous combination?BMJ, 2014
- Online Sources of Herbal Product InformationThe American Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Chinese social media reaction to the MERS-CoV and avian influenza A(H7N9) outbreaksInfectious Diseases of Poverty, 2013
- Twitter as a source of vaccination information: Content drivers and what they are sayingAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2013
- Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 OutbreakPLOS ONE, 2010
- YouTube As a Source of Information on the H1N1 Influenza PandemicAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2010
- Regulatory and Ethical Issues with Dietary SupplementsPharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2000