Comparative evaluation of microleakage among Resin-Based and nonResin-Based Restorative Materials in dentine cavities
Open Access
- 6 February 2019
- journal article
- Published by Peertechz Publications Private Limited in Journal of Dental Problems and Solutions
- Vol. 6 (1), 001-005
- https://doi.org/10.17352/2394-8418.000064
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of dentin surface treatments on shear bond strength of glass-ionomer cementsAnnali di Stomatologia, 2014
- In Vitro Performance of Class I and II Composite Restorations: A Literature review on Nondestructive Laboratory Trials—Part IIOperative Dentistry, 2013
- Prediction and diagnosis of clinical outcomes affecting restoration marginsJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2011
- Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage Among Three Different Glass Ionomer TypesOperative Dentistry, 2011
- In Vivo and In Vitro Evaluations of Microleakage Around Class I Amalgam and Composite RestorationsOperative Dentistry, 2010
- Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomesDental Materials, 2010
- An In-Vitro Study of Microleakage Around Class V Cavities Bonded with a Self-Etching Material Versus a Conventional Two-Bottle SystemPrimary Dental Care, 2006
- Glass polyalkenoate bond strength to dentine after chemomechanical caries removalJournal of Dentistry, 1994
- Bonding of amalgam to tooth structure: Tensile adhesion and microleakage testsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1988
- A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cementBritish Dental Journal, 1972