Quality of Democracy Makes a Difference, but Not for Everyone: How Political Interest, Education, and Conceptions of Democracy Condition the Relationship Between Democratic Quality and Political Trust
Open Access
- 7 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Political Science
Abstract
In light of recent crises, not least the COVID-19 pandemic, citizen trust in the political system has been highlighted as one of the central features ensuring citizen compliance and the functioning of democracy. Given its many desirable consequences, one of the key questions is how to increase political trust among ordinary citizens. This paper investigates the role of democratic quality in determining citizens’ trust in the political system. While we know that citizens’ evaluations of democratic performance are a strong predictor of political trust, previous research has shown that trust is not always higher in political systems with higher democratic quality, indicating that democratic performance evaluations do not always correspond to actual democratic quality. Several moderating factors may account for this disconnect between democratic quality and citizens’ evaluations of democratic performance and, ultimately, political trust. For one, citizens may receive different information about the political system; second, they may process this information in different ways; and third, they may have different standards of what democratic quality ought to be. Using survey data from three rounds of the World Values Survey (2005–2020) and aggregate data on democratic quality and other macro determinants of political trust from the V-Dem project and World Development Indicators for 50 democracies around the world, this contribution empirically investigates the complex relationship between democratic quality, democratic performance evaluations, and political trust in multi-level moderated mediation models. Its findings demonstrate that democratic quality affects political trust indirectly through citizens’ democratic performance evaluations and that this indirect effect is stronger for citizens with higher political interest, higher education, and especially those with more liberal conceptions of democracy.Keywords
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why feed the hand that bites you? Perceptions of procedural fairness and system support in post‐communist democraciesEuropean Journal of Political Research, 2011
- Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law complianceEuropean Journal of Political Research, 2011
- In what we trust? A multi-level study into trust in parliament as an evaluation of state characteristicsInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 2010
- Why Resource-poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel DataAmerican Political Science Review, 2009
- Critical Citizens and Submissive Subjects: Election Losers and Winners in AfricaBritish Journal of Political Science, 2009
- The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American CountriesThe Journal of Politics, 2002
- Winning, Losing and Political Trust in AmericaBritish Journal of Political Science, 2002
- Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political EngagementThe Journal of Politics, 1997
- Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluations of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist SocietiesThe Journal of Politics, 1997
- Public Information Campaigns as Policy InstrumentsJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1994