Perspectives of Physician and Pharmacist Stewards on Successful Antibiotic Stewardship Program Implementation: A Qualitative Study
Open Access
- 1 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 7 (7), ofaa229
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa229
Abstract
Background. Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) are required at every hospital regardless of size. We conducted a qualitative study across different hospital settings to examine perspectives of physician and pharmacist stewards about the dynamics within their team and contextual factors that facilitate the success of their programs. Methods. Semistructured interviews were conducted in March-November 2018 with 46 ASP stewards, 30 pharmacists, and 16 physicians, from 39 hospitals within 2 large hospital systems. Results. We identified 5 major themes: antibiotic stewards were enthusiastic about their role, committed to the goals of stewardship for their patients and as a public-health imperative, and energized by successful interventions; responsibilities of pharmacist and physician stewards are markedly different, and pharmacy stewards performed the majority of the day-to-day stewardship work; collaborative teamwork is important to improving care, the pharmacists and physicians supported each other, and pharmacists believed that having a strong physician leader was essential; provider engagement strategies are a critical component of stewardship, and recommendations must be communicated in a collegial manner that did not judge the provider competence, preferably through faceto-face interactions; and hospital leadership support for ASP goals and for protected time for ASP activities is critical for success. Conclusions. The physician-pharmacist team is essential for ASPs; most have pharmacists leading and performing day-to-day activities with physician support. Collaborative, persuasive approaches for ASP interventions were the norm. Stewards were careful not to criticize or judge inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Further research should examine whether this persuasive approach undercuts provider appreciation of stewardship as a public health mandate.Funding Information
- Agency for Healthcare and Research Quality (5R01HS025175-03)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antibiotic consumption on antibiotic resistanceBMC Infectious Diseases, 2014
- Understanding the Determinants of Antimicrobial Prescribing Within Hospitals: The Role of "Prescribing Etiquette"Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2013
- Policy Statement on Antimicrobial Stewardship by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS)Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2012
- Show Me the Money: Long-Term Financial Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship ProgramInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2012
- Antimicrobial Stewardship at a Large Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center: Cost Analysis Before, During, and After a 7-Year ProgramInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2012
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Community Hospitals: The Evidence Base and Case StudiesClinical Infectious Diseases, 2011
- Developing and Using a Codebook for the Analysis of Interview Data: An Example from a Professional Development Research ProjectField Methods, 2010
- Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation scienceImplementation Science, 2009
- Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Guidelines for Developing an Institutional Program to Enhance Antimicrobial StewardshipClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Codebook Development for Team-Based Qualitative AnalysisCAM Journal, 1998