Personalized Cancer Follow-Up Care Pathways: A Delphi Consensus of Research Priorities
Open Access
- 25 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 112 (12), 1183-1189
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa053
Abstract
Development of personalized, stratified follow-up care pathways where care intensity and setting vary with needs could improve cancer survivor outcomes and efficiency of health-care delivery. Advancing such an approach in the United States requires identification and prioritization of the most pressing research and data needed to create and implement personalized care pathway models. Cancer survivorship research and care experts (n = 39) participated in an in-person workshop on this topic in 2018. Using a modified Delphi technique—a structured, validated system for identifying consensus—an expert panel identified critical research questions related to operationalizing personalized, stratified follow-up care pathways for individuals diagnosed with cancer. Consensus for the top priority research questions was achieved iteratively through 3 rounds: item generation, item consolidation, and selection of the final list of priority research questions. From the 28 research questions that were generated, 11 research priority questions were identified. The questions were categorized into 4 priority themes: determining outcome measures for new care pathways, developing and evaluating new care pathways, incentivizing new care pathway delivery, and providing technology and infrastructure to support self-management. Existing data sources to begin answering questions were also identified. Although existing data sources, including cancer registry, electronic medical record, and health insurance claims data, can be enhanced to begin addressing some questions, additional research resources are needed to address these priority questions.Funding Information
- American Cancer Society through the Intramural Research program
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Models of Cancer Survivorship Health Care: Moving ForwardAsco Educational Book, 2014
- Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2014
- Cancer Survivors in the United States: Prevalence across the Survivorship Trajectory and Implications for CareCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2013
- Implementing improved post-treatment care for cancer survivors in England, with reflections from Australia, Canada and the USABritish Journal of Cancer, 2012
- Differences Between Primary Care Physicians’ and Oncologists’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding the Care of Cancer SurvivorsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2011
- Projections of the Cost of Cancer Care in the United States: 2010-2020JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2008
- A Shortage of Oncologists? The American Society of Clinical Oncology Workforce StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Future Supply and Demand for Oncologists : Challenges to Assuring Access to Oncology ServicesJournal of Oncology Practice, 2007
- Models for Delivering Survivorship CareJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006