Supporting social prescribing in primary care by linking people to local assets: a realist review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 13 March 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medicine
- Vol. 18 (1), 1-15
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-1510-7
Abstract
BackgroundSocial prescribing is a way of addressing the 'non-medical' needs (e.g. loneliness, debt, housing problems) that can affect people's health and well-being. Connector schemes (e.g. delivered by care navigators or link workers) have become a key component to social prescribing's delivery. Those in this role support patients by either (a) signposting them to relevant local assets (e.g. groups, organisations, charities, activities, events) or (b) taking time to assist them in identifying and prioritising their 'non-medical' needs and connecting them to relevant local assets. To understand how such connector schemes work, for whom, why and in what circumstances, we conducted a realist review.MethodA search of electronic databases was supplemented with Google alerts and reference checking to locate grey literature. In addition, we sent a Freedom of Information request to all Clinical Commissioning Groups in England to identify any further evaluations of social prescribing connector schemes. Included studies were from the UK and focused on connector schemes for adult patients (18+ years) related to primary care.ResultsOur searches resulted in 118 included documents, from which data were extracted to produce context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs). These CMOCs underpinned our emerging programme theory that centred on the essential role of 'buy-in' and connections. This was refined further by turning to existing theories on (a) social capital and (b) patient activation.ConclusionOur realist review highlights how connector roles, especially link workers, represent a vehicle for accruing social capital (e.g. trust, sense of belonging, practical support). We propose that this then gives patients the confidence, motivation, connections, knowledge and skills to manage their own well-being, thereby reducing their reliance on GPs. We also emphasise within the programme theory situations that could result in unintended consequences (e.g. increased demand on GPs).Funding Information
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research (390)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The ersatz realism of critical realism: A reply to PorterEvaluation, 2015
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: Reflections on the 2008 MRC guidanceInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2013
- What The Evidence Shows About Patient Activation: Better Health Outcomes And Care Experiences; Fewer Data On CostsHealth Affairs, 2013
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidanceInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2012
- Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practicesNew Media & Society, 2011
- Toward a neighborhood resource-based theory of social capital for health: Can Bourdieu and sociology help?Social Science & Medicine (1982), 2006
- Development and Testing of a Short Form of the Patient Activation MeasureHealth Services Research, 2005
- Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventionsJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and Measuring Activation in Patients and ConsumersHealth Services Research, 2004
- Is Bowling Together Sociologically Lite? Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American CommunityContemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 2001