Patient and public involvement in research: from tokenistic box ticking to valued team members
Open Access
- 13 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medicine
- Vol. 18 (1), 1-7
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01544-7
Abstract
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research envisages a relationship built throughout the lifespan of a research project between academics, clinicians and PPI colleagues in order to inform, plan, execute and, in due course, disseminate and translate research. To be meaningful, all stakeholders need to actively engage in this exchange of expertise. However, despite some funders requiring PPI plans to be included in grant applications, there remains a gap between what is expected and what is delivered. As an exemplar, we reflect on how, in the Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research (AUKCAR), we set out to create a supportive, organised environment with the overarching value of ‘keeping patients at the heart of everything we do’. The key has been in planning and creating a suitably funded organisational infrastructure with dedicated PPI researchers along with the development of and expectation to abide by an agreed set of norms and values. Specifically, expecting AUKCAR PhD students and early career researchers to engage with PPI has established a working mode that we hope will last. Regular interactions and proactive Patient Leads increase PPI network cohesion. With adaptation, the AUKCAR PPI model can be translated to international contexts.Keywords
Funding Information
- Asthma UK (AUK-AC-2018-01)
- National Institute for Health Research (16/136/109)
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient and public involvement in health research in low and middle-income countries: a systematic reviewBMJ Open, 2019
- Learning as an outcome of involvement in research: what are the implications for practice, reporting and evaluation?Research Involvement and Engagement, 2019
- Using the Public Involvement Impact Assessment Framework to assess the impact of public involvement in a mental health research context: A reflective case studyHealth Expectations, 2018
- Patient Participation at Health Care Conferences: Engaged Patients Increase Information Flow, Expand Propagation, and Deepen Engagement in the Conversation of Tweets Compared to Physicians or ResearchersJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2017
- From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvementBMJ Quality & Safety, 2016
- A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and CommunitiesThe Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2014
- Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic reviewHealth Expectations, 2012
- Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service managementSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2008
- Should patients have a role in patient safety? A safety engineering viewHeart, 2007
- Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health careBMJ, 2002