Proactive screening for symptoms: A simple method to improve early detection of unrecognized cardiovascular disease in primary care. Results from the Lifelines Cohort Study
Open Access
- 1 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Preventive Medicine
- Vol. 138, 106143
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106143
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Hartstichting
- European Research Council
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Population screening of 75- and 76-year-old men and women for silent atrial fibrillation (STROKESTOP)EP Europace, 2012
- Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohortsBMJ, 2012
- Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohortsBMJ, 2012
- Is patient self-report an adequate tool for monitoring cardiovascular conditions in patients with hypercholesterolemia?Journal of Public Health, 2010
- Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2007
- Unrecognized myocardial infarction: The association with cardiopulmonary symptoms and mortality is mediated via echocardiographic abnormalities of global dysfunction instead of regional dysfunction: The Olmsted County Heart Function StudyAmerican Heart Journal, 2006
- Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failureJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- The association of Rose questionnaire angina pectoris and coronary calcification in a general population: The Rotterdam Coronary Calcification StudyAnnals of Epidemiology, 2004
- Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimatesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive valuesBMJ, 1994