Abstract
Leadership scholarship, in terms of theories and models, continues to make risky assumptions that the person in a leader role accurately accounts for not only follower behavior, but also the motives and personality aspects from which said behaviors manifest. In this paper we propose an integrated path model that utilizes both Leader-Member Exchange and Transformational Leadership, while explicitly focusing on the science behind interpersonal judgment accuracy. It is only by having an accurate understanding of the follower, which has been a long held untested assumption, can congruence be purposely obtained, narrowing the gap between ideology and practice.