Association Between Central and Peripheral Age-Related Hearing Loss and Different Frailty Phenotypes in an Older Population in Southern Italy

Abstract

Question Are physical frailty or cognitive frailty phenotypes associated with age-related hearing loss in an older community-dwelling population? Findings In this population-based cross-sectional study of 1929 community-dwelling older individuals in southern Italy, the prevalence of peripheral age-related hearing loss and age-related central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) was higher in physical and cognitive frailty groups than in the nonfrail group. Age-related CAPD was associated only with cognitive frailty. Meaning In this study, age-related CAPD was independently associated with cognitive frailty, suggesting that management of age-related hearing loss may be associated with development of different frailty phenotypes. Importance The association between age-related hearing loss (ARHL) and physical or cognitive frailty has been poorly explored. These associations could define new perspectives for delaying frailty-related processes in older age. Objective To examine whether peripheral ARHL and age-related central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) are independently associated with physical or cognitive frailty. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study analyzed registry data from December 31, 2014, on 1929 older (≥65 years) participants of the Salus in Apulia Study (Southern Italy) who underwent audiologic, physical, and neuropsychological assessment. Data analysis was performed from December 12, 2019, to January 4, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of peripheral ARHL in older individuals with physical and/or cognitive frailty and those without frailty assessed using the Fried criteria (physical) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (cognitive). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations of audiologic variables with frailty phenotype. Results Data from 1929 participants (mean [SD] age, 73.6 [6.3] years; 974 male [50.5%]) were eligible for the analyses. The prevalence of peripheral ARHL was higher in the physical frailty group (96 [26.6%]) than in the nonfrail group (329 [21.0%]) (difference, 5.61 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.63-10.59 percentage points) and in the cognitive frailty group (40 [38.8%]) than in the nonfrail group (385 [21.1%]) (difference, 17.75 percentage points; 95% CI, 8.2-27.3 percentage points). Age-related CAPD was more prevalent in the physical frailty group (62 [17.2%]) than in the nonfrail group (219 [14.0%]) (difference, 3.21 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.04 to 7.46 percentage points) and in the cognitive frailty group (28 [27.2%]) than in the nonfrail group (253 [13.9%]) (difference, 13.33 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.10-22.21 percentage points). In the multivariable models, age-related CAPD was associated with cognitive frailty in the fully adjusted model (odds ratio [OR], 1.889; 95% CI, 1.094-3.311). There was also an inverse association between the unitary increase in Synthetic Sentence Identification With the Ipsilateral Competitive Message scores, indicating a lower likelihood of this disorder, and cognitive frailty (OR, 0.989; 95% CI, 0.988-0.999). Peripheral ARHL was associated with cognitive frailty only in the partially adjusted model (OR, 1.725; 95% CI, 1.008-2.937). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of 1929 participants, age-related CAPD was independently associated with cognitive frailty. Whether the management of ARHL may help prevent the development of different frailty phenotypes or improve their clinical consequences should be addressed in longitudinal studies and, eventually, well-designed randomized clinical trials. Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment. Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. Err on the side of full disclosure. If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response. Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.