The interaction between numerical and continuous non-numerical magnitudes in a double change detection paradigm.
- 1 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Vol. 47 (11), 1810-1819
- https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001062
Abstract
In the field of numerical cognition, researchers conventionally assess nonsymbolic numerical abilities with the help of number comparison tasks, in which participants need to compare two arrays. Many studies emphasized that visual (non-numerical) dimensions can serve as strategic cues and influence the decision on numerosity in these tasks. In this study, we suggest the use of a novel paradigm based on the change detection paradigm. Here, participants had to simultaneously pay attention to numerical changes and visual changes on a target non-numerical dimension (individual area, total area, field area, or density). Participants had to detect changes relative to the two dimensions and press response keys indicating either number change or visual change or press both keys. In such a double change detection paradigm, and unlike number comparison tasks, target and covarying dimensions cannot serve as cues to influence the numerical decision. We found that numerical change detection was excellent and stable across the conditions. Further, participants were more likely to falsely consider visual changes as numerical changes than the other way around. Lastly, when both dimensions varied, participants more frequently missed visual changes than numerical changes. Overall, our findings show that numerosity was the most salient visual dimension. From a methodological perspective, such a double change detection paradigm could be of critical interest to assess numerical abilities for future studies.Funding Information
- Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (T.1052.15)
- European Union (799171)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhoodProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
- Visual stimulus parameters seriously compromise the measurement of approximate number system acuity and comparative effects between adults and childrenFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Young children's understanding of “more” and discrimination of number and surface area.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
- Judgement of discrete and continuous quantity in adults: Number counts!The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2012
- A common visual metric for approximate number and densityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Generating nonsymbolic number stimuliBehavior Research Methods, 2011
- The relative salience of discrete and continuous quantity in young infantsDevelopmental Science, 2009
- Judgments of discrete and continuous quantity: An illusory Stroop effectCognition, 2008
- Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievementNature, 2008
- Sometimes area counts more than numberProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006