Air Monitoring Stations Far Removed From Drilling Activities Do Not Represent Residential Exposures to Marcellus Shale Air Pollutants. Response to the Paper by Hess et al. on Proximity-Based Unconventional Natural Gas Exposure Metrics
Open Access
- 13 January 2020
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 17 (2), 504
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020504
Abstract
In their study “Assessing Agreement in Exposure Classification between Proximity-Based Metrics and Air Monitoring Data in Epidemiology Studies of Unconventional Resource Development” Hess et alThis publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association Between Unconventional Natural Gas Development in the Marcellus Shale and Asthma ExacerbationsJAMA Internal Medicine, 2016
- Analysis of non-methane hydrocarbon data from a monitoring station affected by oil and gas development in the Eagle Ford shale, TexasElementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 2016
- Predictors of Indoor Radon Concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1989–2013Environmental Health Perspectives, 2015
- Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in Pennsylvania, USAEpidemiology, 2015
- Human exposure to unconventional natural gas development: A public health demonstration of periodic high exposure to chemical mixtures in ambient airJournal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 2015
- Lifetimes and emissions of SO2 from point sources estimated from OMIGeophysical Research Letters, 2015
- Birth Outcomes and Maternal Residential Proximity to Natural Gas Development in Rural ColoradoEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2014
- Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic2012
- MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTICAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1987