Determinants of Rejected Mail Ballots in Georgia’s 2018 General Election
- 25 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Research Quarterly
- Vol. 75 (1), 231-243
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912921993537
Abstract
Because of the COVID-19 threat to in-person voting in the November 2020 election, state and local election officials have pivoted to mail-in voting as a potential solution. This method of voting—while safe from a public health standpoint—comes with its own set of problems, as increased use of mail voting risks amplifying existing discrepancies in rejected mail ballots. While some mail ballot rejections are to be expected, a lack of uniformity in whose ballots get rejected among subgroups of voters—whether for mistakes on a ballot return envelope (BRE) or lateness—raise concerns about equal representation. We draw on official statewide voter file and mail-in ballot data from the 2018 midterm election in Georgia, a state that until the pandemic did not have widespread use of mail voting, to test whether some voters are more likely to cast a mail ballot that does not count. Most importantly, we distinguish between ballots rejected for lateness and those rejected for a mistake on the return envelope. We find that newly registered, young, and minority voters have higher rejection rates compared with their counterparts.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Voter ID Laws Be Administered in a Race-Neutral Manner? Evidence from the City of Boston in 2008Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2012
- Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State LegislatorsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2011
- The Cost of ConveniencePolitical Research Quarterly, 2010
- Effects of Identification Requirements on Voting: Evidence from the Experiences of Voters on Election DayPS: Political Science and Politics, 2009
- Are All Precincts Created Equal?Political Research Quarterly, 2008
- The Street‐Level Bureaucrats of Elections: Selection Methods for Local Election OfficialsReview of Policy Research, 2006
- Meeting the Challenge of Latino Voter MobilizationThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2005
- The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United StatesAmerican Politics Research, 2005
- Race, Bureaucratic Discretion, and the Implementation of Welfare ReformAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2004
- The First Seven Years of the Political Life CycleAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2001