The identification of key indicators to drive quality improvement in obstetric anaesthesia: results of the Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association/National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit collaborative Delphi project
Open Access
- 27 October 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 75 (5), 617-625
- https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14861
Abstract
A three‐stage Delphi survey process was undertaken to identify the quality indicators considered the most relevant to obstetric anaesthesia. The initial quality indicators assessed were derived from national peer‐reviewed publications and were divided into service provision, service quality and clinical outcomes. A range of stakeholders were invited to participate and divided into three panels: obstetric anaesthetists; other maternity care health professionals; and women who had used maternity services. In total, 133 stakeholders registered to participate with 80% completing all three phases of the survey process. Participants ranked indicators for their relative importance using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation scale. From an initial list of 31 quality indicators, 11 indicators were rated as extremely important by > 90% of participants in at least two panels. These 11 indicators were presented to stakeholders; they were asked to vote for the five indicators they considered most relevant and useful for assessing and benchmarking the quality of obstetric anaesthesia provided. The indicators chosen were: the percentage of women who had an epidural/combined spinal‐epidural for labour analgesia with accidental dural puncture; the presence of guidelines for the referral of patients to an anaesthetist for antenatal review; whether there are dedicated elective caesarean section lists; the availability of point‐of‐care testing for estimation of haemoglobin concentration; and the percentage of epidurals for labour analgesia that provided adequate pain relief within 45 min of the start of epidural insertion. These indicators may be used for quality improvement and national benchmarking to support the implementation of quality standards in obstetric anaesthesia.Funding Information
- Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Creating Change at ScaleObstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 2019
- Collecting data for quality improvement in obstetric anaesthesiaInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 2019
- The COMET Handbook: version 1.0Trials, 2017
- Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic ReviewPLOS ONE, 2011
- Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing StudiesPLoS Medicine, 2011
- Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansionBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2005
- Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvementInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2003
- Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary careQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- Evaluating the Quality of Medical CareThe Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1966