The Rio Branco Declaration: Assessing Progress Toward a Near-Term Voluntary Deforestation Reduction Target in Subnational Jurisdictions Across the Tropics
Open Access
- 26 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Abstract
Voluntary commitments are playing an ever-greater role in environmental governance at all scales. In the years preceding the signing of the Paris Agreement in 2015, a flurry of non-state and state actors signed on to various declarations and commitments to reduce deforestation as one globally significant climate mitigation solution. This paper focuses on the Rio Branco Declaration (RBD) and the 30 first-order subnational jurisdictions located in Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, and Peru that signed it between 2014 and 2018, committing to reduce deforestation 80% by 2020, conditional upon adequate support from the international community. We assess each study jurisdiction’s progress toward that commitment in terms of reducing deforestation, and examine a subset of the potential factors supporting or slowing progress, including the existence of commensurate targets within jurisdictions’ legal frameworks and the international financial support pledged to jurisdictions. We found that progress toward achieving the target was slow and likely unattainable in most jurisdictions outside of Brazil. Among the four jurisdictions likely to achieve the target under current deforestation trajectories, only Mato Grosso State has a target within its legal framework that is more ambitious than the RBD target. We found that the international response to the RBD was sluggish and likely inadequate – with only one financial pledge made in direct response to the declaration and the majority of funding to support jurisdictional efforts coming from one source. We did not find a clear relationship between international finance pledged and progress toward the RBD deforestation target; however, more often, jurisdictions that received pledges earlier have made more progress. We explore what may explain individual jurisdictions’ performance with respect to the target, including specific jurisdictional circumstances, national context, and international support. We estimate that, if current deforestation trajectories continue, the RBD signatories in our study could contribute approximately 3.7% (0.65 GtCO2e) of the greenhouse gas emissions reduction needed to keep global warming at 1.5°C, compared with a potential 5.7% (0.98 GtCO2e) if they were to all meet the RBD target.Keywords
Funding Information
- Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (16_III_071_Global_A_Low-Emissions Rural Development)
- Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid (QZA-0701 QZA–16/0162 -Forests, Farms and Finance Initiative)
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- The emissions gap between the Copenhagen pledges and the 2°C climate goal: Options for closing and risks that could widen the gapGlobal Environmental Change, 2011
- The Transamazon Highway: Past, Present, FuturePublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2010
- High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the AmazonProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- The End of Deforestation in the Brazilian AmazonScience, 2009
- Paying to save the rainforestsNature, 2009
- A comparison of baseline methodologies for 'Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'Carbon Balance and Management, 2009
- Decentralization of Natural Resource Governance RegimesAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 2008
- REDD models and baselinesInternational Forestry Review, 2008
- Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008