Comparative evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy and laser-assisted mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy: An original research article
Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medknow in Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure
- Vol. 9 (1), 7-11
- https://doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_54_19
Abstract
J Indian Prosthodont Soc, Official publication of Indian Prosthodontic SocietyKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teethEmergencias, 2014
- In Vivo Evaluation of the Treatment Outcome of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Using Diode Laser, Formocresol, and Ferric SulphatePhotomedicine and Laser Surgery, 2014
- Mineral Trioxide Aggregate as Pulp Capping Agent for Primary Teeth Pulpotomy: 2 Year Follow Up StudyJournal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2009
- Evaluation of formocresol versus ferric sulphate primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta‐analysisInternational Endodontic Journal, 2007
- Evaluation of the formocresol versus mineral trioxide aggregate primary molar pulpotomy: a meta-analysisOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 2006
- Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol‐zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser‐mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomyInternational Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 2005
- Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol.2005
- Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth.2004
- Histopathological changes in dental pulps irradiated by CO2 laser: A preliminary report on laser pulpotomyJournal of Endodontics, 1985