Catastrophic cognitions about coronavirus: the Oxford psychological investigation of coronavirus questionnaire [TOPIC-Q]
Open Access
- 22 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychological Medicine
- Vol. 52 (15), 3550-3559
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291721000283
Abstract
Background Cognitive therapies are developed on the principle that specific cognitive appraisals are key determinants in the development and maintenance of mental health disorders. It is likely that particular appraisals of the coronavirus pandemic will have explanatory power for subsequent mental health outcomes in the general public. To enable testing of this hypothesis we developed a questionnaire assessing coronavirus-related cognitions. Methods 12 285 participants completed online a 46-item pool of cognitions about coronavirus and six measures of different mental health problems. The sample was randomly split into derivation and validation samples. Exploratory factor analyses determined the factor structure, selection of items, and model fit in the derivation sample. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) then tested this model in the validation sample. Associations of the questionnaire with mental health outcomes were examined. Results The 26-item, seven-factor, Oxford Psychological Investigation of Coronavirus Questionnaire [TOPIC-Q] was developed. CFA demonstrated a good model fit (χ2 = 2108.43, df = 278, p < 0.001, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.950, Tucker−Lewis index (TLI) = 0.942, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.033, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.038). The factors were: cognitions about (1) safety and vulnerability, (2) negative long-term impact, (3) having the virus, (4) spreading the virus, (5) social judgment, (6) negative self, and (7) being targeted. The questionnaire explained significant variance in depression (45.8%), social anxiety (37.3%), agoraphobia (23.2%), paranoia (27.3%), post-traumatic stress disorder (57.1%), and panic disorder (31.4%). Cognitions about negative long-term impact had the greatest explanatory power across disorders. Conclusions TOPIC-Q provides a method to assess appraisals of the pandemic, which is likely to prove helpful both in longitudinal studies assessing mental health outcomes and in delivery of psychological therapy.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans.Psychological Assessment, 2016
- The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analysesCognitive Therapy and Research, 2012
- The PHQ-9Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001
- Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN)The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2000
- Does old age reduce the risk of anxiety and depression? A review of epidemiological studies across the adult life spanPsychological Medicine, 2000
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Multicenter Collaborative Panic Disorder Severity ScaleAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1997
- A cognitive approach to panicBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1986
- The Mobility Inventory for AgoraphobiaBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1985
- Cognitive therapy: Nature and relation to behavior therapyBehavior Therapy, 1970