Occupational Noise Dose Reduction via Behavior Modification Using In-Ear Dosimetry among United States Air Force Personnel Exposed to Continuous and Impulse Noise
Open Access
- 1 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Scientific Research Publishing, Inc. in Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology
- Vol. 09 (02), 61-81
- https://doi.org/10.4236/ojsst.2019.92005
Abstract
In-ear dosimetry and noise exposure feedback were used to modify worker attitude and behavior regarding hearing protection use. The study specifically addressed whether providing in-ear noise exposure data to workers resulted in a reduction in average noise dose rate equivalent continuous levels. Nineteen combat arms instructors (impulse noise group) and heavy equipment operators (continuous noise group) working for the United States Air Force volunteered to participate in a six-month field study using in-ear dosimeters to collect daily noise level data. Participants served as their own control group, receiving periodic noise exposure feedback reports in the latter half of the study only. The control and feedback phase noise exposure data were examined using analysis of variance for differences that could be indicative of more effective hearing protection device use. Additionally, a 7-point Likert survey was used to monitor worker attitude towards hearing protection use, and worker medical histories were examined for evidence of previous hearing loss. Overall, this research found a significant reduction in noise dose rate equivalent continuous level (-2.5 dB with p = 0.019) for the continuous noise group following periodic noise exposure feedback on in-ear noise levels. This effect was not detected at the individual level due to limited samples. No effect was detected in the impulse noise population, likely due to limitations of dosimeter technology in response to impulse noise. No correlation between worker attitudes towards hearing protection and noise dose rate equivalent continuous level was detected for either group (continuous p = 0.249; impulse p = 0.478). While workers reported that in-ear dosimeters and noise exposure feedback helped them control their exposures, few reported using immediate feedback functions to control noise exposures within a work shift. These results indicate that in-ear dosimetry and noise exposure feedback could provide an effective tool to reduce worker noise exposures over time. However, advances in dosimeter technology are necessary before it can be evaluated for impulse noise. Additionally, further research is necessary to understand the link between worker attitude and hearing protection device use.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of daily noise exposure monitoring on occupational noise exposures in manufacturing workersInternational Journal of Audiology, 2013
- Role of continuous monitoring in a hearing conservation programNoise and Health, 2011
- Effect of daily noise exposure monitoring on annual rates of hearing loss in industrial workersOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2010
- The Attitude Base as a Moderator of the Effectiveness of Inoculation StrategyCommunication Monographs, 2009
- An examination of antecedents to coal miners' hearing protection behaviors: A test of the theory of planned behaviorJournal of Safety Research, 2008
- Should Persuasion Be Affective or Cognitive? The Moderating Effects of Need for Affect and Need for CognitionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2008
- Reexamining the Job Satisfaction-Performance Relationship: The Complexity of Attitudes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004
- Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes: Conceptual and Methodological IssuesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1994
- Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude–behavior relation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Affective-cognitive consistency, attitudes, conformity, and behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975