Derivation of Patient-Defined Adverse Cardiovascular and Noncardiovascular Events Through a Modified Delphi Process
- 4 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Network Open
- Vol. 4 (1), e2032095
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32095
Abstract
Therapeutic decisions are challenging for patients with advanced cardiovascular disease, because there is a paucity of evidence to support patient-centered outcomes in this group.1,2 Traditional cardiovascular trials have sometimes been termed tombstone trials3 because of their focus on major adverse cardiac events and death. However, a prior survey2 of cardiovascular patients found that important outcomes identified by patients were very different from those used in traditional trials. Because patients with advanced cardiovascular disease are likely to be elderly with substantial comorbidities, they are more often concerned with how treatment might impact their ability to lead an independent life with less impairment and outside of chronic care institutions. Our group previously explored the concept of disability-free survival as a patient-defined outcome after coronary revascularization.2 We conducted the present study to refine this outcome by integrating the perspectives of patients and their caregivers, with input from expert clinicians. We term this outcome patient-defined adverse cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events (PACE).This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The PCORI Perspective on Patient-Centered Outcomes ResearchJAMA, 2014
- Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2014
- Meaningful Outcome Measures in Cardiac Surgery2014
- Incorporating patient and family preferences into evidence-based medicineBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2013
- The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) National Priorities for Research and Initial Research AgendaJAMA, 2012
- Outcome selection and role of patient reported outcomes in contemporary cardiovascular trials: systematic reviewBMJ, 2010
- Inconvenient truths about supplier induced demand and unwarranted variation in medical practiceBMJ, 2009
- Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groupsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007
- Outcomes that matter to patients in tombstone trialsThe Lancet, 2001
- Bridging the gap.: The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicinePatient Education and Counseling, 2000