Liberal or Constrained? Judicial Incorporations of Other Rules of International Law in the UNCLOS and the Application of the “Genuine Link Test”
Open Access
- 31 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Yijun Institute of International Law in Journal of East Asia and International Law
- Vol. 13 (1), 161-178
- https://doi.org/10.14330/jeail.2020.13.1.08
Abstract
The UNCLOS regulates complex balance of rights and duties among State parties. Its text was deliberately left vague as a result of compromise between the negotiating parties. To develop the legal norms, judges and arbitrators have referred to other rules of international law through systematic integration, rules of reference, and broad applicable law. However, judicial practice has expanded subject-matter jurisdiction beyond the UNCLOS, causing antinomy between Articles 288, on jurisdiction, and 293 of UNCLOS, on applicable law. Part XV of the UNCLOS has created an invisible community that would ideally lead the UNCLOS Tribunals to develop and follow a pragmatic approach as to the limits of their subject-matter jurisdiction in order to provide for judicial coherence. When interpreting the treaty, the establishment of genuine links between disputes and substantive rules under the UNCLOS is necessary, by which other rules of international law are firmly anchored to the interpreted texts under the UNCLOS.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond the Four Corners of the Convention: Expanding the Scope of Jurisdiction of Law of the Sea TribunalsOcean Development & International Law, 2017
- Expansions and Restrictions in the UNCLOS Dispute Settlement Regime: Lessons from Recent DecisionsChinese Journal of International Law, 2016
- Judicial Settlement of International Environmental Disputes: Current ProblemsJournal of International Dispute Settlement, 2013
- Judicial Activism in International Law--A Conceptual Framework for AnalysisJournal of International Dispute Settlement, 2012
- The Distinction between Interpretation and Application of Norms in International AdjudicationJournal of International Dispute Settlement, 2011