Perceiving Intersensory and Emotional Qualities of Everyday Objects: A Study on Smoothness or Sharpness Features with Line Drawings by Designers
- 21 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Brill in Art and Perception
- Vol. 9 (3), 220-240
- https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-bja10026
Abstract
A large number of studies have focused on the aesthetic value of smoothly curved objects. By contrast, angular shapes tend to be associated with tertiary qualities such as threat, hardness, loudness, nervousness, etc. The present study focuses on the effect of curvilinearity vs angularity on the aesthetic experience of design artefacts. We used the drawings of everyday objects with novel shapes created by 56 designers (IUAV image dataset). Each drawing had two versions: a smooth and an angular version. To test new tertiary associations, beyond aesthetic value, we obtained ratings for seven characteristics (‘soft/hard, sad/cheerful, male/female, bad/good, aggressive/peaceful, agitated/serene, useless/useful’) from 174 naïve observers. Importantly, each naïve rater saw only one of the two versions of an object. The results confirmed a significant relation between smoothness and hardness as well as other (tertiary) associations. The link between smoothness and usefulness confirms that perceptual utility is significantly influenced by the shape of the object. This finding suggests that tertiary qualities convey both static and functional information about design objects. The role of perceptual constraints in drawing design artefacts is also discussed. A large number of studies have focused on the aesthetic value of smoothly curved objects. By contrast, angular shapes tend to be associated with tertiary qualities such as threat, hardness, loudness, nervousness, etc. The present study focuses on the effect of curvilinearity vs angularity on the aesthetic experience of design artefacts. We used the drawings of everyday objects with novel shapes created by 56 designers (IUAV image dataset). Each drawing had two versions: a smooth and an angular version. To test new tertiary associations, beyond aesthetic value, we obtained ratings for seven characteristics (‘soft/hard, sad/cheerful, male/female, bad/good, aggressive/peaceful, agitated/serene, useless/useful’) from 174 naïve observers. Importantly, each naïve rater saw only one of the two versions of an object. The results confirmed a significant relation between smoothness and hardness as well as other (tertiary) associations. The link between smoothness and usefulness confirms that perceptual utility is significantly influenced by the shape of the object. This finding suggests that tertiary qualities convey both static and functional information about design objects. The role of perceptual constraints in drawing design artefacts is also discussed.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Product design and apparent usability. The influence of novelty in product appearanceApplied Ergonomics, 2012
- Product Design: Preference for Rounded versus Angular Design ElementsPsychology & Marketing, 2012
- Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that people associate with chocolate samples varying in cocoa contentFood Quality and Preference, 2011
- Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluationsFood Quality and Preference, 2011
- The cycle of preference: Long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciationActa Psychologica, 2010
- The Taste of CarbonationScience, 2009
- PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in PythonJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 2007
- Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006
- How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetingsDesign Studies, 2005
- Dimensions in appreciation of car interior designApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2005