Interaction between time, ASPECTS, and clinical mismatch
- 3 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
- Vol. 12 (9), 911-914
- https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015921
Abstract
BackgroundImaging-based patient selection for neurothrombectomy is reliant on the identification of irreversibly damaged brain tissue (core) and salvageable tissue (penumbra). The DAWN trial used the clinical-core mismatch (CCM) paradigm (clinical deficit out of proportion to infarct volume). We aim to determine the prevalence of CCM in large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes and study the impact of time and the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) on the likelihood of mismatch.MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational analysis of internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery M1 occlusions with available advanced imaging (relative cerebral blood flow/MRI). We used automated software for infarct volume analysis and ASPECTS determination. The prevalence of CCM and the impact of time and ASPECTS were analyzed.ResultOne hundred and eighty-five LVO strokes were included. Mean age was 71±15 years and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 (range 12–21). Mean ischemic core volume was 50±69 mL. Within 0–24 hours, CCM was present in 53% and ranged from 63% in 0–3 hours to 25% at 21–24 hours (p=0.03). Prevalence of mismatch reduced 1.6% for every 1 hour increase in time to imaging. CCM prevalence by ASPECTS groups was: ASPECTS 9–10: 77%, ASPECTS 6–8: 65%, ASPECTS 0–5: 13% (pConclusionsCCM is present in 57% and 50% of LVO strokes in the 0–6 and 6–24 hour window, respectively. The prevalence of mismatch declines with increasing time (1.6%/hour) and decreasing ASPECTS (6.4%/point). Among ASPECTS groups the prevalence of mismatch does not decline over time. These data support the use of an ASPECTS-based paradigm for late window patient selection.Keywords
Funding Information
- NIH Stroke Trial Network (U10NS086489)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke AssociationStroke, 2019
- 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke AssociationStroke, 2018
- Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion ImagingThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2018
- Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and InfarctThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2018
- Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2016
- Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy after Intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA Alone in StrokeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Thrombectomy within 8 Hours after Symptom Onset in Ischemic StrokeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic StrokeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with Perfusion-Imaging SelectionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic StrokeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015