The Attractiveness Advantage At Work: A Cross-Disciplinary Integrative Review
- 1 July 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Annals
- Vol. 14 (2), 1103-1139
- https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0134
Abstract
Compared with people of average attractiveness, the highly attractive earn roughly 20 percent more and are recommended for promotion more frequently. The dominant view of this “attractiveness advantage” is one of taste-based discrimination, whereby attractive individuals are preferred without justification in economic productivity. We conduct a comprehensive review of research on attractiveness discrimination, finding relatively more evidence that this phenomenon constitutes, to some extent, statistical (as opposed to solely taste-based) discrimination, in which decision makers assume that attractive people are more competent and discriminate based on instrumental motives. We then review research that speaks to whether decision makers might be correct in assuming that attractive workers are more productive, finding that the attractive possess a slight advantage in human and a notable advantage in social capital. We finally review studies evaluating whether an advantage exists beyond that explained by capital differences. We find that the current body of work provides inconclusive evidence of taste-based but relatively more conclusive evidence of statistical discrimination processes. Our integrative view suggests how attractiveness biases can be detected more effectively, and points to key directions for future research on the sources of the attractiveness advantage. We conclude by discussing the promise of an integrative approach to understanding other achievement gaps, such as those on the basis of gender, race, and social class.Keywords
This publication has 135 references indexed in Scilit:
- A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model.American Psychologist, 2012
- Millennials, narcissism, and social networking: What narcissists do on social networking sites and whyPersonality and Individual Differences, 2011
- Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in scienceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Narcissism and attractivenessJournal of Research in Personality, 2010
- Unpacking the relation between extraversion and volunteering in later life: The role of social capitalPersonality and Individual Differences, 2007
- Women in the information technology profession: a literature review, synthesis and research agendaEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 2002
- Personality Strength and Social CapitalCommunication Research, 2000
- Effects of Performance Information and Physical Attractiveness on Managerial Decisions about PromotionThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1988
- Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job typeOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985
- The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury taskJournal of Research in Personality, 1974