Secondary analyses of global datasets: do obesity and physical activity explain variation in diabetes risk across populations?
Open Access
- 11 February 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International Journal of Obesity
- Vol. 45 (5), 944-956
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00764-y
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes rates vary significantly across geographic regions. These differences are sometimes assumed to be entirely driven by differential distribution of environmental triggers, including obesity and insufficient physical activity (IPA). In this review, we discuss data which conflicts with this supposition. We carried out a secondary analysis of publicly available data to unravel the relative contribution of obesity and IPA towards diabetes risk across different populations. We used sex-specific, age-standardized estimates from Non-Communicable Disease Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) on diabetes (1980–2014) and obesity (1975–2016) rates, in 200 countries, and from WHO on IPA rates in 168 countries in the year 2016. NCD-RisC and WHO organized countries into nine super-regions. All analyses were region- and sex-specific. Although obesity has been increasing since 1975 in every part of the world, this was not reflected in a proportional increase in diabetes rates in several regions, including Central and Eastern Europe, and High-income western countries region. Similarly, the association of physical inactivity with diabetes is not homogeneous across regions. Countries from different regions across the world could have very similar rates of diabetes, despite falling on opposite ends of IPA rate spectrum. The combined effect of obesity and IPA on diabetes risk was analyzed at the worldwide and country level. The overall findings highlighted the larger impact of obesity on disease risk; low IPA rates do not seem to be protective of diabetes, when obesity rates are high. Despite that, some countries deviate from this overall observation. Sex differences were observed across all our analyses. Overall, data presented in this review indicate that different populations, while experiencing similar environmental shifts, are apparently differentially subject to diabetes risk. Sex-related differences observed suggest that males and females are either subject to different risk factor exposures or have different responses to them.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abdominal Superficial Subcutaneous FatDiabetes Care, 2012
- The association of physical inactivity with Type 2 diabetes among different ethnic groupsDiabetic Medicine, 2011
- Lifestyle Intervention for Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Health CareDiabetes Care, 2010
- Is visceral obesity the cause of the metabolic syndrome?Annals of Medicine, 2006
- Walking Compared With Vigorous Physical Activity and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in WomenJAMA, 1999
- The impact of body build on the relationship between body mass index and percent body fatInternational Journal of Obesity, 1999
- Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports MedicineJAMA, 1995
- Obesity, Fat Distribution, and Weight Gain as Risk Factors for Clinical Diabetes in MenDiabetes Care, 1994
- Physical activity and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in womenThe Lancet, 1991
- Regional distribution of body fat, plasma lipoproteins, and cardiovascular disease.Arteriosclerosis: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association, Inc., 1990