Intrauterine versus external tocodynamometry in monitoring labour: a randomised controlled clinical trial
- 1 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 127 (13), 1677-1686
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16343
Abstract
Objective To investigate whether the use of intrauterine tocodynamometry versus external tocodynamometry (IT versus ET) during labour reduces operative deliveries and improves newborn outcome. As IT provides more accurate information on labour contractions, the hypothesis was that it may more appropriately guide oxytocin use than ET. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Two labour wards, in a university tertiary hospital and a central hospital. Population A total of 1504 parturients with singleton pregnancies, gestational age >= 37 weeks and fetus in cephalic position: 269 women with uterine scars, 889 nulliparas and 346 parous women with oxytocin augmentation. Methods Participants underwent IT (n = 736) or ET (n = 768) during the active first stage of labour. Main outcome measures Primary outcome: rate of operative deliveries. Secondary outcomes: duration of labour, amount of oxytocin given, adverse neonatal outcomes. Results Operative delivery rates were 26.9% (IT) and 25.9% (ET) (odds ratio 1.05, 95% CI 0.84-1.32,P = 0.663). The ET to IT conversion rate was 31%. We found no differences in secondary outcomes (IT versus ET). IT reduced oxytocin use during labours with signs of fetal distress, and trial of labour after caesarean section. Conclusions IT did not reduce the rate of operative deliveries, use of oxytocin, or adverse neonatal outcomes, and it did not shorten labour duration. Tweetable abstract IT (versus ET) reduced oxytocin use in high-risk labours but did not influence operative delivery rate or adverse neonatal outcomes.Funding Information
- Suomen Kulttuurirahasto (00180293)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complications Associated with Insertion of Intrauterine Pressure Catheters: An Unusual Case of Uterine Hypertonicity and Uterine Perforation Resulting in Fetal Distress after Insertion of an Intrauterine Pressure CatheterCase Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012
- Anaphylactoid Syndrome After Intrauterine Pressure Catheter PlacementObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- Outcomes after Internal versus External Tocodynamometry for Monitoring LaborThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC‐2)—a systematic review with meta‐analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC‐2 versus VBAC‐1 and repeat (third) caesarean sectionsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2009
- Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter: A report of two cases and review of the literatureThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2008
- Elevated uterine activity increases the risk of fetal acidosis at birthAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- SYSTEMATIC REVIEW: WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine ruptureBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2005
- Induction of Labour: Does Internal Tocography Result in Better Obstetric Outcome than External TocographyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- A randomized control study of oxytocin augmentatioi of labour. 2. Uterine activityBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987
- A multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial of induction of labour with an automatic closed‐loop feedback controlled oxytocin infusion systemBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985