Simulating a Community Mental Health Service During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Effects of Clinician-Clinician Encounters, Clinician-Patient-Family Encounters, Symptom-Triggered Protective Behaviour, and Household Clustering
Open Access
- 24 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in American Journal of Translational Research
- Vol. 12, 620842
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.620842
Abstract
Objectives: Face-to-face healthcare, including psychiatric provision, must continue despite reduced interpersonal contact during the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus) pandemic. Community-based services might use domiciliary visits, consultations in healthcare settings, or remote consultations. Services might also alter direct contact between clinicians. We examined the effects of appointment types and clinician-clinician encounters upon infection rates. Design: Computer simulation. Methods: We modelled a COVID-19-like disease in a hypothetical community healthcare team, their patients, and patients' household contacts (family). In one condition, clinicians met patients and briefly met family (e.g., home visit or collateral history). In another, patients attended alone (e.g., clinic visit), segregated from each other. In another, face-to-face contact was eliminated (e.g., videoconferencing). We also varied clinician-clinician contact; baseline and ongoing "external" infection rates; whether overt symptoms reduced transmission risk behaviourally (e.g., via personal protective equipment, PPE); and household clustering. Results: Service organisation had minimal effects on whole-population infection under our assumptions but materially affected clinician infection. Appointment type and inter-clinician contact had greater effects at low external infection rates and without a behavioural symptom response. Clustering magnified the effect of appointment type. We discuss infection control and other factors affecting appointment choice and team organisation. Conclusions: Distancing between clinicians can have significant effects on team infection. Loss of clinicians to infection likely has an adverse impact on care, not modelled here. Appointments must account for clinical necessity as well as infection control. Interventions to reduce transmission risk can synergize, arguing for maximal distancing and behavioural measures (e.g., PPE) consistent with safe care.Funding Information
- Medical Research Council
- Wellcome Trust
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected PneumoniaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agentsJournal of Hospital Infection, 2020
- Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: A data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreakInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: A data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreakPublished by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory ,2020
- Complexity of the Basic Reproduction Number (R0)Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2019
- Effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment and Oseltamivir Prophylaxis during Avian Influenza A (H7N7) Epidemic, the Netherlands, 2003Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Modeling targeted layered containment of an influenza pandemic in the United StatesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- The epidemiology of the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong – what we do know and what we don'tEpidemiology and Infection, 2004
- Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systemsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002
- The Mathematics of Infectious DiseasesSIAM Review, 2000