Study protocol: NeoCLEAR: Neonatal Champagne Lumbar punctures Every time – An RCT: a multicentre, randomised controlled 2 × 2 factorial trial to investigate techniques to increase lumbar puncture success
Open Access
- 15 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Pediatrics
- Vol. 20 (1), 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02050-8
Abstract
The neonatal period carries the highest risk of bacterial meningitis (~ 1 in 5000 births), bearing high mortality (~ 10%) and morbidity (20–50%) rates. Lumbar puncture (LP) remains essential to the diagnosis of meningitis. Though LP is a common procedure in neonates, success rates are lower (50–60%) than in other patient populations. None of the currently-practised neonatal LP techniques are supported by evidence from adequately-powered, randomised controlled trials (RCTs). NeoCLEAR aims to compare two modifications to the traditional technique which are free, accessible, and commonly practised: sitting (as opposed to lying) position, and ‘early’ (as opposed to ‘late’) stylet removal. Written parental informed consent permitting, infants in neonatal/maternity wards, of 27+ 0 to 44+ 0 weeks corrected gestational age and weighing ≥1000 g, who require an LP, will be randomly allocated to sitting or lying position, and to early or late stylet removal. The co-primary objectives are to compare success rates (the proportion of infants with cerebrospinal fluid red cell count < 10,000/mm3 on first LP procedure) in 1020 infants between the two positions, and between the two methods of stylet removal. Secondary outcomes relate to LP procedures, complications, diagnoses of meningitis, duration of antibiotics and hospital stay. A modified intention-to-treat analysis will be conducted. Two modifications to the traditional LP technique (sitting vs lying position; and early vs late stylet removal) will be simultaneously investigated in an efficient and appropriately-powered 2 × 2 factorial RCT design. Analysis will identify the optimal techniques (in terms of obtaining easily-interpretable cerebrospinal fluid), as well as the impact on infants, parents and healthcare systems whilst providing robust safety data. Using a pragmatic RCT design, all practitioners will be trained in all LP techniques, but there will inevitably be variation between unit practice guidelines and other aspects of individual care. An improved LP technique would result in: • Fewer uninterpretable samples, repeated attempts and procedures • Reduced distress for infants and families • Decreased antibiotic use and risk of antibiotic resistance • Reduced healthcare costs due to fewer procedures, reduced length of stay, shorter antibiotic courses, and minimised antibiotic-associated complications ISRCTN14040914. Date assigned: 26/06/2018.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Educational Video Improves Technique in Performance of Pediatric Lumbar PuncturesPediatric Emergency Care, 2012
- A Randomized Trial of Simulation-Based Deliberate Practice for Infant Lumbar Puncture SkillsSimulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2011
- A Randomized Study to Validate a Midspinal Canal Depth Nomogram in NeonatesAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 2009
- Improving the outcome of neonatal meningitisCurrent Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Prolonged Duration of Initial Empirical Antibiotic Treatment Is Associated With Increased Rates of Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Death for Extremely Low Birth Weight InfantsPEDIATRICS, 2009
- Traumatic Lumbar Punctures in NeonatesThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2008
- Risk Factors for Traumatic or Unsuccessful Lumbar Punctures in ChildrenAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2007
- Local Anesthetic and Stylet Styles: Factors Associated With Resident Lumbar Puncture SuccessPEDIATRICS, 2006
- ORAL PRESENTATIONSPediatric Emergency Care, 2002
- Family caregiver social problem-solving abilities and adjustment during the inital year of the caregiving role.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2001