Stopping exploitation: Properly remunerating healthcare workers for risk in the COVID‐19 pandemic
Open Access
- 7 February 2021
- Vol. 35 (4), 372-379
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12845
Abstract
We argue that we should provide extra payment not only for extra time worked but also for the extra risks healthcare workers (and those working in healthcare settings) incur while caring for COVID‐19 patients—and more generally when caring for patients poses them at significantly higher risks than normal. We argue that the extra payment is warranted regardless of whether healthcare workers have a professional obligation to provide such risky healthcare. Payment for risk would meet four essential ethical requirements. First, assuming healthcare workers do not have a professional obligation to take on themselves the risks, payments in the form of incentives would preserve autonomy in deciding what risks to take on oneself. Second, even assuming that healthcare workers do have a professional obligation to take on themselves the risks, payments for risk would create fair working conditions by avoiding exploitation. Third, payments for risk would make it more likely that public healthcare systems can discharge their institutional responsibility to provide healthcare in circumstances where healthcare workers may otherwise (perhaps legitimately) opt out. Fourth, payments for risk would guarantee an efficient healthcare system in pandemic situations. Finally, we address two likely objections that some might raise against our proposal, particularly with regard to incentives, namely that such payments or incentives can themselves be coercive and that they represent a form of undue inducement.Keywords
Funding Information
- Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/V006819/1)
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic: what are their duties and what is owed to them?Journal of Medical Ethics, 2020
- Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk modelJournal of Medical Ethics, 2020
- 'Your country needs you': the ethics of allocating staff to high-risk clinical roles in the management of patients with COVID-19Journal of Medical Ethics, 2020
- Balancing the duty to treat with the duty to family in the context of the COVID-19 pandemicJournal of Medical Ethics, 2020
- Compensation for cures: Why we should pay a premium for participation in ‘challenge studies’Bioethics, 2019
- Ethics, Pandemics, and the Duty to TreatAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2008
- Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?Journal of Medical Ethics, 2008
- Ethics Manual: Fourth EditionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998