Thoughts on morphomes, on a Scandinavian background
- 15 June 2019
- book chapter
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company
- p. 159-196
- https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.207.06eng
Abstract
Since Aronoff (1994), the notion of morphomic patterns, i.e. inflectional patterns without complete motivation from outside of morphology, has gained popularity, especially in works on Romance (e.g. Maiden 2016a). However, the approach has also been criticized. Bowern (2015) suggests that there is very little evidence for autonomously morphological patterns arising. This paper presents a number of Scandinavian counter-examples to her claim. Bermúdez-Otero & Luís (2016) present a number of meta-theoretical objections against the notion of morphomic patterns. Arguments are presented to the effect that a number of these objections are less significant than they appear; some are even misguided.Keywords
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- Allomorphy, autonomous morphology and phonological conditioning in the history of the Daco‐Romance present and subjunctiveTransactions of the Philological Society, 2011
- The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive scienceBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2009
- Heteroclisis and Paradigm LinkageLanguage, 2006
- Low-level schemas or general rules? The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Polish case inflectionsLanguage Sciences, 2006
- Stems and ParadigmsLanguage, 2003
- Autonomy and Functionalist LinguisticsLanguage, 1995
- Inflection Classes, Gender, and the Principle of ContrastLanguage, 1994
- On Rules of ReferralLanguage, 1993
- Irregularity as a determinant of morphological changeJournal of Linguistics, 1992
- Local and General MarkednessLanguage, 1982